ArticleMaedica2015
Negative Pressure, a "Solution" in the Treatment of Infected Knee Prosthesis?
Article in Maedica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of muscular flaps for the treatment of knee prosthetic joint infection: A systematic review.Orthopedic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Wound debridement products and techniques: clinical examples and literature review.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2022Review
- INCISIONAL NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY IN REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INFECTION.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2018Article
- Murine Model Imitating Chronic Wound Infections for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNegative-pressure wound therapy is a therapeutic technique that uses a vacuum dressing in order to promote healing in acute or chronic wounds. The continued vacuum draws out fluid from the wound and increases blood flow to the area. The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness of negative pressure therapy increasing this way the chances of rehabilitation after knee prosthesis infections. MATERIAL AND
method11 patients with septic complications after total knee joint replacement were involved into this study, from the Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology of Bucharest Emergency University Hospital. In all of the cases negative pressure wound treatment was applied. The surgical approach was chosen according to the surgeon's preferences or along the pre-existing surgical approach. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Time from the knee arthroplasty to the clinical and biological manifestation of septic complications was about 35 days with limits between 21 and 42 days. In most cases we managed to keep the implant, the outcome obviously being conditioned by using the negative pressure. Knee infections are still a hazardous problem in orthopedic surgery. Negative-pressure system increased the granulation tissue formation and the local blood flow and enhanced the bacterial clearance function.
conclusionsThe clinical outcome in our cases indicates that the Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy can be a valuable contribution to the treatment of knee joint infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26225142PMC4496767W1034055623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.