Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225012›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2014

Comparative, Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis of Three Anorganic Bovine Xenogenous Bone Substitutes: Bio-Oss, Bone-Fill and Gen-Ox Anorganic.

Rafael Manfro, Fabiano Silva Fonseca, Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi, Wilson Roberto Sendyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafael ManfroDepartment of Dental Implantology, SOEBRAS, Street Presidente Coutinho 264/903, Florianópolis, SC CEP 88015-230 Brazil.
Fabiano Silva FonsecaVitória, ES Brazil.
Marcelo Carlos BortoluzziDepartment of Implantodontic Maxillofacial Surgery, UNOESC, Joaçaba, SC Brazil.
Wilson Roberto SendykUNISA, Santo Amaro, SP Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnorganic bovine xenogenous grafts show the best performance as bone substitutes in implantodontics. Bio-Oss is the world's most widely used and investigated anorganic bone substitute. This article compares two anorganic bovine bone substitutes (Bone-Fill and Gen-Ox anorganic) with Bio-Oss. MATERIALS AND

methodsEight New Zealand rabbits were implanted with 4 titanium cylinders randomly filled with Bio-Oss, Bone-Fill, Gen-Ox anorganic or a blood clot. Four animals were sacrificed after 8 weeks; 12 weeks later, the remaining four were sacrificed. The contents of the cylinders were removed, cut and stained with HE before they were evaluated with an optical microscope. The samples were submitted to histomorphometry for analysis.

resultsThe bone formation with Bio-Oss at 8 weeks was 8.43 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 9.32 mm(2). The bone formation with Bone-Fill at 8 weeks was 7.24 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 9.01 mm(2). The bone formation with Gen-Ox anorganic at 8 weeks was 2.78 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 3.02 mm(2). The bone formation with the blood clot at 8 weeks was 0.65 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 0.63 mm(2).

conclusionFollowing this model, Bone-Fill was comparable to Bio-Oss and superior to Gen-Ox and blood clot.

Indexed as

Anorganic bovine xenogenous graftBone reconstructionOsseointegrated implants

Identifiers

PMID26225012
PMCPMC4518797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.