ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015
Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catecholaminergic Modulation of Conflict Control Depends on the Source of Conflicts.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2018Trial
- Premovement Suppression of Corticospinal Excitability Is Modulated by Reaction Time Task Requirements.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Wearable Wireless EMG Sensors for Monitoring Post-Error Neuromuscular Responses During a Sport-Specific Inhibitory Control Task.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Respiratory and Cardiac Phase Coupling With Voluntary Actions Across Motor Tasks.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Motor Intention Drives Corticospinal Facilitation during Interception Planning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Inhibitory control of response execution when a frequently cued response set is rarely replaced with an alternative one.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Amelioration of emotional processing deficits in individuals with high trait anxiety following high-intensity interval training.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Corticospinal excitability during timed interception depends on the speed of the moving target.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Preparing to act follows Bayesian inference rules.iScience · 2025Article
- Brain Activation During Motor Preparation and Execution in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: An fNIRS Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- The role of inhibitory and excitatory neurometabolites in age-related differences in action selection.npj aging · 2025Article
- The microgravity environment affects sensorimotor adaptation and its neural correlates.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- The role of dorsal premotor cortex in joint action inhibition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Relationship between transcranial magnetic stimulation markers of motor control and clinical recovery in obsessive compulsive disorder/Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: a proof of concept case study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Sequential effect and temporal orienting in prestimulus oculomotor inhibition.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Unsigned surprise but not reward magnitude modulates the integration of motor elements during actions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor system excitability is transiently inhibited during the preparation of responses. Previous studies have attributed this inhibition to the operation of two mechanisms, one hypothesized to help resolve competition between alternative response options, and the other to prevent premature response initiation. By this view, inhibition should be restricted to task-relevant muscles. Although this prediction is supported in one previous study (Duque et al., 2010), studies of stopping ongoing actions suggest that some forms of motor inhibition may be widespread (Badry et al., 2009). This motivated us to conduct a series of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments to examine in detail the specificity of preparatory inhibition in humans. Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevant muscles during response preparation, even when the muscles were contralateral and not homologous to the responding effector. Inhibition was also observed in both choice and simple response task conditions, with and without a preparatory interval. Control experiments ruled out that this inhibition is due to expectancy of TMS or a possible need to cancel the prepared response. These findings suggest that motor inhibition during response preparation broadly influences the motor system and likely reflects a process that occurs whenever a response is selected. We propose a reinterpretation of the functional significance of preparatory inhibition, one by which inhibition reduces noise to enhance signal processing and modulates the gain of a selected response. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Motor preparation entails the recruitment of excitatory and inhibitory neural mechanisms. The current experiments address the specificity of inhibitory mechanisms, asking whether preparatory inhibition affects task-irrelevant muscles. Participants prepared a finger movement to be executed at the end of a short delay period. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex provided an assay of corticospinal excitability. Consistent with earlier work, the agonist muscle for the forthcoming response was inhibited during the preparatory period. Moreover, this inhibition was evident in task-irrelevant muscles, although the magnitude of inhibition depended on whether the response was fixed or involved a choice. These results implicate a broadly tuned inhibitory mechanism that facilitates response preparation, perhaps by lowering background activity before response initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.