Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224851›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Structural Variability within Frontoparietal Networks and Individual Differences in Attentional Functions: An Approach Using the Theory of Visual Attention.

Magdalena Chechlacz, Celine R Gillebert, Signe A Vangkilde, Anders Petersen, Glyn W Humphreys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Brain Training with Video Games in Covert Hepatic Encephalopathy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magdalena ChechlaczDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, and magdalena.chechlacz@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1811-3946
Celine R GillebertDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6686-7262
Signe A VangkildeDepartment of Psychology, Center for Visual Cognition, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders PetersenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Visual Cognition, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Glyn W HumphreysDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, and.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visuospatial attention allows us to select and act upon a subset of behaviorally relevant visual stimuli while ignoring distraction. Bundesen's theory of visual attention (TVA) (Bundesen, 1990) offers a quantitative analysis of the different facets of attention within a unitary model and provides a powerful analytic framework for understanding individual differences in attentional functions. Visuospatial attention is contingent upon large networks, distributed across both hemispheres, consisting of several cortical areas interconnected by long-association frontoparietal pathways, including three branches of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF I-III) and the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF). Here we examine whether structural variability within human frontoparietal networks mediates differences in attention abilities as assessed by the TVA. Structural measures were based on spherical deconvolution and tractography-derived indices of tract volume and hindrance-modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA). Individual differences in visual short-term memory (VSTM) were linked to variability in the microstructure (HMOA) of SLF II, SLF III, and IFOF within the right hemisphere. Moreover, VSTM and speed of information processing were linked to hemispheric lateralization within the IFOF. Differences in spatial bias were mediated by both variability in microstructure and volume of the right SLF II. Our data indicate that the microstructural and macrostrucutral organization of white matter pathways differentially contributes to both the anatomical lateralization of frontoparietal attentional networks and to individual differences in attentional functions. We conclude that individual differences in VSTM capacity, processing speed, and spatial bias, as assessed by TVA, link to variability in structural organization within frontoparietal pathways.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdultAttentionBrain MappingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFrontal LobeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleNeural PathwaysParietal LobeVisual PerceptionYoung Adultdiffusion tractographyfrontoparietal attention networksindividual differencestheory of visual attentionvisual attentionvisuospatial memory

Identifiers

PMID26224851
PMCPMC4518045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.