Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224718›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2015

Renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension: review and clinical perspective.

Radu Iliescu, Thomas E Lohmeier, Ionut Tudorancea, Luke Laffin, George L Bakris

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The denervation or activation of renal sympathetic nerve and renal blood flow.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The renin-angiotensin system in cardiovascular autonomic control: recent developments and clinical implications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Role of the Immune System in Hypertension.Physiological reviews · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Radu IliescuDepartment of Physiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Gr. T. Popa," Iasi, Romania;
Thomas E LohmeierDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi; and.
Ionut TudoranceaDepartment of Physiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Gr. T. Popa," Iasi, Romania;
Luke LaffinDepartment of Medicine, ASH Comprehensive Hypertension Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
George L BakrisDepartment of Medicine, ASH Comprehensive Hypertension Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois gbakris@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL VASCULAR ADAPTATION OF THE MICROCIRCULATIONP01HL051971 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALL, JOHN E · 1993 to 2018
$39.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-51971NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL051971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When introduced clinically 6 years ago, renal denervation was thought to be the solution for all patients whose blood pressure could not be controlled by medication. The initial two studies, SYMPLICITY HTN-1 and HTN-2, demonstrated great magnitudes of blood pressure reduction within 6 mo of the procedure and were based on a number of assumptions that may not have been true, including strict adherence to medication and absence of white-coat hypertension. The SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial controlled for all possible factors believed to influence the outcome, including the addition of a sham arm, and ultimately proved the demise of the initial overly optimistic expectations. This trial yielded a much lower blood pressure reduction compared with the previous SYMPLICITY trials. Since its publication in 2014, there have been many analyses to try and understand what accounted for the differences. Of all the variables examined that could influence blood pressure outcomes, the extent of the denervation procedure was determined to be inadequate. Beyond this, the physiological mechanisms that account for the heterogeneous fall in arterial pressure following renal denervation remain unclear, and experimental studies indicate dependence on more than simply reduced renal sympathetic activity. These and other related issues are discussed in this paper. Our perspective is that renal denervation works if done properly and used in the appropriate patient population. New studies with new approaches and catheters and appropriate controls will be starting later this year to reassess the efficacy and safety of renal denervation in humans.

Indexed as

DenervationDrug ResistanceHumansHypertension, RenalKidneyRenal CirculationSympathectomydenervationhypertensionpathophysiologyrenal nervesresistance

Identifiers

PMID26224718
PMCPMC4593817
OpenAlexW2314297626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.