Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224706›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Exposure to static electric fields leads to changes in biogenic amine levels in the brains of Drosophila.

Philip L Newland, Mesfer S Al Ghamdi, Suleiman Sharkh, Hitoshi Aonuma, Christopher W Jackson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Can electrostatic fields limit the take-off of tiny whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci)?Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Electromagnetic field exposure (50 Hz) impairs response to noxious heat in American cockroach.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Philip L NewlandCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK pln@soton.ac.uk.
Mesfer S Al GhamdiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Al Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.
Suleiman SharkhEngineering Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Hitoshi AonumaResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan.
Christopher W JacksonCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBAl Baha University · SAJapan Science and Technology Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural and anthropogenic static electric fields are commonly found in the environment and can have both beneficial and harmful effects on many animals. Here, we asked how the fruitfly responds to these fields and what the consequences of exposure are on the levels of biogenic amines in the brain. When given a choice in a Y-tube bioassay Drosophila avoided electric fields, and the greater the field strength the more likely Drosophila were to avoid it. By comparing wild-type flies, flies with wings surgically removed and vestigial winged flies we found that the presence of intact wings was necessary to produce avoidance behaviour. We also show that Coulomb forces produced by electric fields physically lift excised wings, with the smaller wings of males being raised by lower field strengths than larger female wings. An analysis of neurochemical changes in the brains showed that a suite of changes in biogenic amine levels occurs following chronic exposure. Taken together we conclude that physical movements of the wings are used by Drosophila in generating avoidance behaviour and are accompanied by changes in the levels of amines in the brain, which in turn impact on behaviour.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsAvoidance LearningBiogenic AminesBrainChoice BehaviorDrosophila melanogasterElectromagnetic FieldsFemaleMaleBiogenic Aminesaminesflyhigh voltagelocomotionstatic electric fields

Identifiers

PMID26224706
PMCPMC4528531
OpenAlexW2276017876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.