Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224704›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

A Genome-Wide Landscape of Retrocopies in Primate Genomes.

Fábio C P Navarro, Pedro A F Galante

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Census and genetic analysis of the United States marmoset population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The complete genome of a songbird.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The mutational load in natural populations is significantly affected by high primary rates of retroposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Cancer, Retrogenes, and Evolution.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fábio C P NavarroCentro de Oncologia Molecular, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil Dep. de Bioquímica, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro A F GalanteCentro de Oncologia Molecular, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil pgalante@mochsl.org.br.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is a key factor contributing to phenotype diversity across and within species. Although the availability of complete genomes has led to the extensive study of genomic duplications, the dynamics and variability of gene duplications mediated by retrotransposition are not well understood. Here, we predict mRNA retrotransposition and use comparative genomics to investigate their origin and variability across primates. Analyzing seven anthropoid primate genomes, we found a similar number of mRNA retrotranspositions (∼7,500 retrocopies) in Catarrhini (Old Word Monkeys, including humans), but a surprising large number of retrocopies (∼10,000) in Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys), which may be a by-product of higher long interspersed nuclear element 1 activity in these genomes. By inferring retrocopy orthology, we dated most of the primate retrocopy origins, and estimated a decrease in the fixation rate in recent primate history, implying a smaller number of species-specific retrocopies. Moreover, using RNA-Seq data, we identified approximately 3,600 expressed retrocopies. As expected, most of these retrocopies are located near or within known genes, present tissue-specific and even species-specific expression patterns, and no expression correlation to their parental genes. Taken together, our results provide further evidence that mRNA retrotransposition is an active mechanism in primate evolution and suggest that retrocopies may not only introduce great genetic variability between lineages but also create a large reservoir of potentially functional new genomic loci in primate genomes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationRetroelementsAnimalsCatarrhiniGenomeGenomicsHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMicePlatyrrhiniRatsRNA, MessengerSpecies SpecificityTranscriptomeRetroelementsRNA, Messengergene duplicationprimate genomesretrocopyretrogene

Identifiers

PMID26224704
PMCPMC4558860
OpenAlexW2167437246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.