Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224644›Full record

ReviewMolecular ecology2016

Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication.

Ryan J Haasl, Bret A Payseur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-wide selective sweep analysis in high-altitude Changthangi goats reveals candidate genes for pashmina fiber production.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan J HaaslDepartment of Biology, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, 1 University Plaza, Platteville, WI, 53818, USA.
Bret A PayseurLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
The Genetics and Evolution of Extreme Body Size in Mice from Gough IslandR01GM100426 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PAYSEUR, BRET A · 2012 to 2020
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100426NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomewide scans for natural selection (GWSS) have become increasingly common over the last 15 years due to increased availability of genome-scale genetic data. Here, we report a representative survey of GWSS from 1999 to present and find that (i) between 1999 and 2009, 35 of 49 (71%) GWSS focused on human, while from 2010 to present, only 38 of 83 (46%) of GWSS focused on human, indicating increased focus on nonmodel organisms; (ii) the large majority of GWSS incorporate interpopulation or interspecific comparisons using, for example F(ST), cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity or the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions; (iii) most GWSS focus on detection of directional selection rather than other modes such as balancing selection; and (iv) in human GWSS, there is a clear shift after 2004 from microsatellite markers to dense SNP data. A survey of GWSS meant to identify loci positively selected in response to severe hypoxic conditions support an approach to GWSS in which a list of a priori candidate genes based on potential selective pressures are used to filter the list of significant hits a posteriori. We also discuss four frequently ignored determinants of genomic heterogeneity that complicate GWSS: mutation, recombination, selection and the genetic architecture of adaptive traits. We recommend that GWSS methodology should better incorporate aspects of genomewide heterogeneity using empirical estimates of relevant parameters and/or realistic, whole-chromosome simulations to improve interpretation of GWSS results. Finally, we argue that knowledge of potential selective agents improves interpretation of GWSS results and that new methods focused on correlations between environmental variables and genetic variation can help automate this approach.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationSelection, GeneticAnimalsBiodiversityEcologyEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPlantsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidegenetic architecturegenomewide scans for selectionmutationnatural selectionrecombination

Identifiers

PMID26224644
PMCPMC4868130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.