Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224574›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research

Results from an online survey investigating ED patients' insights and treatment expectations.

A Burri, H Porst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Web-Based Survey of Patients Dispensed Viagra ConnectPatient preference and adherence · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A BurriDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
H PorstDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data suggest that the currently available therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) do not meet all the patients' and their partners' expectations. The aim was to assess ED patients' treatment expectations for a variety of sex- and drug-related aspects such as importance of spontaneity, partner satisfaction, ideal onset of action and ideal duration of action. A total of n=1124 men with ED and n=410 healthy men, aged 30-75, participated in this online survey. The ED sample was further divided into patients currently undergoing treatment (CTG), patients who had been undergoing treatment in the past (PTG) and naïve patients (NG). The International Index of Erectile Function as well as a mix of study-specific questions was used. All groups considered 'maintaining an erection until the partner reaches orgasm' the most important aspect regarding erectile function. 'Being able to please the partner' was considered as the most important aspect for a fulfilled sex life. The majority of men (38.1%) further considered an onset of action of about 15 min to be desirable. In all, 95.9% further considered a duration of action up to 4 h to be desirable whereas approximately 71% of men considered a duration of more than 12 h to be too long. It seems that once the basic functional aspects related to erectile function have been covered, additional benefits such as 'spontaneity' and 'pleasing the partner' become important and may be critical for choosing the optimum individual treatment, to improve the sexual satisfaction and the adherence to the treatment.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionSexual PartnersAdultAgedErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26224574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.