Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224431›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2015

Ischaemic heart disease incidence and mortality in an extended cohort of Mayak workers first employed in 1948-1982.

Tamara V Azizova, Evgeniya S Grigoryeva, Richard G E Haylock, Maria V Pikulina, Maria B Moseeva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Radiation and circulatory disease.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Sex differences in radiation research.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Areas of research to support the system of radiological protection.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara V Azizova1 Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk, Russia.
Evgeniya S Grigoryeva1 Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk, Russia.
Richard G E Haylock2 Epidemiology Department, Public Health England, Didcot, UK.
Maria V Pikulina1 Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk, Russia.
Maria B Moseeva1 Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk, Russia.
Southern Urals Biophysics InstituteInstitute of Biophysics · RUPublic Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIncidence and mortality from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was studied in an extended cohort of 22,377 workers first employed at the Mayak Production Association during 1948-82 and followed up to the end of 2008.

methodsRelative risks and excess relative risks per unit dose (ERR/Gy) were calculated based on the maximum likelihood using Epicure software (Hirosoft International Corporation, Seattle, WA). Dose estimates used in analyses were provided by an updated "Mayak Worker Dosimetry System-2008".

resultsA significant increasing linear trend in IHD incidence with total dose from external γ-rays was observed after having adjusted for non-radiation factors and dose from internal radiation {ERR/Gy = 0.10 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04 to 0.17]}. The pure quadratic model provided a better fit of the data than did the linear one. No significant association of IHD mortality with total dose from external γ-rays after having adjusted for non-radiation factors and dose from internal alpha radiation was observed in the study cohort [ERR/Gy = 0.06 (95% CI: <0 to 0.15)]. A significant increasing linear trend was observed in IHD mortality with total absorbed dose from internal alpha radiation to the liver after having adjusted for non-radiation factors and dose from external γ-rays in both the whole cohort [ERR/Gy = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.58)] and the subcohort of workers exposed at alpha dose <1.00 Gy [ERR/Gy = 1.08 (95% CI: 0.34 to 2.15)]. No association of IHD incidence with total dose from internal alpha radiation to the liver was found in the whole cohort after having adjusted for non-radiation factors and external gamma dose [ERR/Gy = 0.02 (95% CI: not available to 0.10)]. Statistically significant dose effect was revealed in the subcohort of workers exposed to internal alpha radiation at dose to the liver <1.00 Gy [ERR/Gy = 0.44 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.85)].

conclusionThis study provides strong evidence of IHD incidence and mortality association with external γ-ray exposure and some evidence of IHD incidence and mortality association with internal alpha-radiation exposure. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: It is the first time the validity of internal radiation dose estimates has been shown to affect the risk of IHD incidence.

Indexed as

Nuclear Power PlantsAgedCausalityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadiation InjuriesRisk FactorsRussia

Identifiers

PMID26224431
PMCPMC4730965
OpenAlexW2201089867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.