Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224383›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016

Assessment of urethral support using MRI-derived computational modeling of the female pelvis.

Yun Peng, Rose Khavari, Nissrine A Nakib, Timothy B Boone, Yingchun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Modelling of Soft Connective Tissues to Investigate Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Article
  14. Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.Current opinion in urology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yun PengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, 2027 SERC Building, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, 77024, USA.
Rose KhavariDepartment of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Nissrine A NakibDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Timothy B BooneDepartment of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Yingchun ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, 2027 SERC Building, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, 77024, USA. yzhang94@uh.edu.
University of Houston · USHouston Methodist · USMethodist Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Electromechanical Modeling Approach in Assessing Female SUIR00DK082644 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI ZHANG, YINGCHUN · 2013 to 2015
$690k
Electromechanical Modeling Approach in Assessing Female SUIK99DK082644 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZHANG, YINGCHUN · 2010 to 2011
$180k
NIDDK NIH HHS 4R00DK082644NIDDK NIH HHS K99 DK082644NIDDK NIH HHS K99DK082644NIDDK NIH HHS R00 DK082644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study aimed to assess the role of individual anatomical structures and their combinations to urethral support function.

methodsA realistic pelvic model was developed from an asymptomatic female patient's magnetic resonance (MR) images for dynamic biomechanical analysis using the finite element method. Validation was performed by comparing simulation results with dynamic MR imaging observations. Weaknesses of anatomical support structures were simulated by reducing their material stiffness. Urethral mobility was quantified by examining urethral axis excursion from rest to the final state (intra-abdominal pressure = 100 cmH2O). Seven individual support structures and five of their combinations were studied.

resultAmong seven urethral support structures, we found that weakening the vaginal walls, puborectalis muscle, and pubococcygeus muscle generated the top three largest urethral excursion angles. A linear relationship was found between urethral axis excursions and intra-abdominal pressure. Weakening all three levator ani components together caused a larger weakening effect than the sum of each individually weakened component, indicating a nonlinearly additive pattern. The pelvic floor responded to different weakening conditions distinctly: weakening the vaginal wall developed urethral mobility through the collapsed vaginal canal, while weakening the levator ani showed a more uniform pelvic floor deformation.

conclusionsThe computational modeling and dynamic biomechanical analysis provides a powerful tool to better understand the dynamics of the female pelvis under pressure events. The vaginal walls, puborectalis, and pubococcygeus are the most important individual structures in providing urethral support. The levator ani muscle group provides urethral support in a well-coordinated way with a nonlinearly additive pattern.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansPelvic FloorUrethraVaginaYoung AdultFinite element methodMagnetic resonance imagingPelvic muscleStress urinary incontinenceUrethral hypermobility

Identifiers

PMID26224383
PMCPMC5519823
OpenAlexW1791015550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.