Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224335›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Extracting relations from traditional Chinese medicine literature via heterogeneous entity networks.

Huaiyu Wan, Marie-Francine Moens, Walter Luyten, Xuezhong Zhou, Qiaozhu Mei, Lu Liu, Jie Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Topological Analysis of the Language Networks of Ancient Traditional Chinese Medicine Books.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Collaborative relation annotation and quality analysis in Markyt environment.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huaiyu WanDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China School of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Marie-Francine MoensDepartment of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Walter LuytenDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Xuezhong ZhouSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Qiaozhu MeiSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lu LiuTangoMe Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Jie TangDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China jietang@tsinghua.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a unique and complex medical system that has developed over thousands of years. This article studies the problem of automatically extracting meaningful relations of entities from TCM literature, for the purposes of assisting clinical treatment or poly-pharmacology research and promoting the understanding of TCM in Western countries.

methodsInstead of separately extracting each relation from a single sentence or document, we propose to collectively and globally extract multiple types of relations (eg, herb-syndrome, herb-disease, formula-syndrome, formula-disease, and syndrome-disease relations) from the entire corpus of TCM literature, from the perspective of network mining. In our analysis, we first constructed heterogeneous entity networks from the TCM literature, in which each edge is a candidate relation, then used a heterogeneous factor graph model (HFGM) to simultaneously infer the existence of all the edges. We also employed a semi-supervised learning algorithm estimate the model's parameters.

resultsWe performed our method to extract relations from a large dataset consisting of more than 100,000 TCM article abstracts. Our results show that the performance of the HFGM at extracting all types of relations from TCM literature was significantly better than a traditional support vector machine (SVM) classifier (increasing the average precision by 11.09%, the recall by 13.83%, and the F1-measure by 12.47% for different types of relations, compared with a traditional SVM classifier).

conclusionThis study exploits the power of collective inference and proposes an HFGM based on heterogeneous entity networks, which significantly improved our ability to extract relations from TCM literature.

Indexed as

Medicine, Chinese TraditionalSupport Vector MachineDatasets as TopicHumansInformation Storage and Retrievalcollective inferencefactor graph modelheterogeneous entity networksrelation extractiontraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID26224335
PMCPMC7784314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.