Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26224331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Transcriptional profiling of macrophages derived from monocytes and iPS cells identifies a conserved response to LPS and novel alternative transcription.

Kaur Alasoo, Fernando O Martinez, Christine Hale, Siamon Gordon, Fiona Powrie, Gordon Dougan, Subhankar Mukhopadhyay, Daniel J Gaffney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. High-throughput screening of small molecules targetingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cellular models in autoinflammatory disease research.Clinical & translational immunology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaur AlasooWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Fernando O MartinezBotnar Research Centre (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christine HaleWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Siamon GordonSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fiona PowrieKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gordon DouganWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Subhankar Mukhopadhyay1] Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK [2] Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK [3] Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel J GaffneyWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
University of Oxford · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095688Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSDMs) are a potentially valuable new tool for linking genotype to phenotype in functional studies. However, at a genome-wide level these cells have remained largely uncharacterised. Here, we compared the transcriptomes of naïve and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and IPSDMs using RNA-Seq. The IPSDM and MDM transcriptomes were broadly similar and exhibited a highly conserved response to LPS. However, there were also significant differences in the expression of genes associated with antigen presentation and tissue remodelling. Furthermore, genes coding for multiple chemokines involved in neutrophil recruitment were more highly expressed in IPSDMs upon LPS stimulation. Additionally, analysing individual transcript expression identified hundreds of genes undergoing alternative promoter and 3' untranslated region usage following LPS treatment representing a previously under-appreciated level of regulation in the LPS response.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsCells, CulturedChemokinesGene Expression ProfilingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMonocytesPromoter Regions, GeneticRNASequence Analysis, RNATranscriptome3' Untranslated RegionsChemokinesLipopolysaccharidesRNA

Identifiers

PMID26224331
PMCPMC4519778
OpenAlexW2952814417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.