ArticleCognitive processing2015
Neurophysiological correlates of embodiment and motivational factors during the perception of virtual architectural environments.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emotion Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality: From Statistics to Affective Computing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Pooled it
- Virtual reality environmental enrichment effects on heart rate variability in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Bridging Space Perception, Emotions, and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroarchitecture.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Cognitive efficiency in VR simulated natural indoor environments examined through EEG and affective responses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Women show enhanced proprioceptive target estimation through visual-proprioceptive conflict resolution.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Functional brain connectivity during exposure to the scale and color of interior built environments.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Features of urban green spaces associated with positive emotions, mindfulness and relaxation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Measuring arousal and valence generated by the dynamic experience of architectural forms in virtual environments.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Relationship between electroencephalographic data and comfort perception captured in a Virtual Reality design environment of an aircraft cabin.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Living Space: Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health in Response to Interiors Presented in Virtual Reality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Neuroarchitecture Assessment: An Overview and Bibliometric Analysis.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021Review
- Visual feedback from a virtual body modulates motor illusion induced by tendon vibration.Psychological research · 2021Article
- The Cognitive-Emotional Design and Study of Architectural Space: A Scoping Review of Neuroarchitecture and Its Precursor Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Michelangelo Effect: Art Improves the Performance in a Virtual Reality Task Developed for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Real vs. immersive-virtual emotional experience: Analysis of psycho-physiological patterns in a free exploration of an art museum.PloS one · 2019Article
- Affective computing in virtual reality: emotion recognition from brain and heartbeat dynamics using wearable sensors.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Virtual Reality for Neuroarchitecture: Cue Reactivity in Built Spaces.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- The Enactive Approach to Architectural Experience: A Neurophysiological Perspective on Embodiment, Motivation, and Affordances.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent efforts aimed at providing neuroscientific explanations of how people perceive and experience architectural environments have largely justified the initial belief in the value of neuroscience for architecture. However, a systematic development of a coherent theoretical and experimental framework is missing. To investigate the neurophysiological reactions related to the appreciation of ambiances, we recorded the electroencephalographic (EEG) signals in an immersive virtual reality during the appreciation of interior designs. Such data have been analyzed according to the working hypothesis that appreciated environments involve embodied simulation mechanisms and circuits mediating approaching stimuli. EEG recordings of 12 healthy subjects have been performed during the perception of three-dimensional interiors that have been simulated in a CAVE system and judged according to dimensions of familiarity, novelty, comfort, pleasantness, arousal and presence. A correlation analysis on personal judgments returned that scores of novelty, pleasantness and comfort are positively correlated, while familiarity and novelty are in negative way. Statistical spectral maps reveal that pleasant, novel and comfortable interiors produce a de-synchronization of the mu rhythm over left sensorimotor areas. Interiors judged more pleasant and less familiar generate an activation of left frontal areas (theta and alpha bands), along an involvement of areas devoted to spatial navigation. An increase in comfort returns an enhancement of the theta frontal midline activity. Cerebral activations underlying appreciation of architecture could involve different mechanisms regulating corporeal, emotional and cognitive reactions. Therefore, it might be suggested that people's experience of architectural environments is intrinsically structured by the possibilities for action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26224275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.