ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015
Differential gene methylation in paired glioblastomas suggests a role of immune response pathways in tumor progression.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune cell deconvolution of bulk DNA methylation data reveals an association with methylation class, key somatic alterations, and cell state in glial/glioneuronal tumors.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2021Article
- Musashi-1 Regulates MIF1-Mediated M2 Macrophage Polarization in Promoting Glioblastoma Progression.Cancers · 2021Article
- Subtype-specific signaling pathways and genomic aberrations associated with prognosis of glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Telomere profiles and tumor-associated macrophages with different immune signatures affect prognosis in glioblastoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA and histone methylation are post-transcriptional modifications that have been recently described in gliomas. Indeed, glioma CpG island hypermethylated phenotype has been identified as prognostic biomarker and as a surrogate marker of IDH1/2 mutations. However, the role of DNA methylation in glioblastoma progression is unknown. We sought to analyze DNA methylation levels in paired (initial and recurrent) primary glioblastoma samples to identify candidate pathways that may prone to glioblastoma progression. We have analyzed 12 samples (5 paired samples, two of them with three surgeries) using methylation arrays. We have analyzed differential methylation at probe and at gene region level. Finally, pathway analysis has been performed using differentially methylated regions. All analysis has been performed with R and Bioconductor packages. Mean methylation level at initial sample compared to recurrence was strongly positively correlated (R(2) = 0.98). There was no differentially methylation at probe level. However, at gene level 3080 regions were differentially methylated. Interestingly, pathways analysis showed that the most differentially methylated genes are involved in cellular response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulus (GO:0036006). Methylation levels were strongly conserved when comparing initial to recurrence in primary glioblastomas. Interestingly, differentially methylated pathway analysis suggests that a modulation of methylation in immune response genes may play a role in glioblastoma progression. Further studies are needed to validate the role of methylation of glioblastoma immune response genes in tumor progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.