Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26223828›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2016

CT colonography: a survey of general practitioners' knowledge and interest.

Nicola Flor, Andrea Laghi, Mauro Peri, Gianpaolo Cornalba, Francesco Sardanelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola FlorUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Via di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. nicola.flor@unimi.it.
Andrea LaghiDipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologia e Anatomia Patologica, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Mauro PeriScuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CornalbaUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Via di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Francesco SardanelliUnità di Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
University of Milan · ITOspedale di Latisana · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo verify the knowledge and interest of general practitioners on computed tomography colonography (CTC). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2014, a Web-based questionnaire was proposed to all general practitioners of [Milan, Italy]. The questionnaire consisted of ten questions concerning general practitioners' knowledge about CTC, including application of guidelines in clinical scenarios and diagnostic performance.

resultsOut of 1,053 general practitioners, 231 (22%), 155 men and 76 women (mean age 58 years), completed the survey. We found a significant difference between the age of responders and that of non-responders (p = 0.0033). Of the 231 responders, 84% were aware of the possibility of using CTC as a method for examining the colon-rectum. However, only 57% were aware about low X-ray exposure delivered by CTC and about the possibility of using a reduced cleansing protocol. Only 48% were aware that CTC accuracy in diagnosing 10-mm or larger polyps and colorectal cancers was similar to that of conventional colonoscopy, while 62% were informed about CTC advantages in comparison with double-contrast barium enema; 59% thought that CTC had a potential role as a screening test; 85-86% suggested CTC in the case of refused or incomplete conventional colonoscopy; 79% suggested immediate conventional colonoscopy in the case of at least one 10-mm polyp. About 54% usually prescribe one CTC every 4-6 months, while 36% never have, 3% one CTC per month, and 7% one every 2-3 months. Ninety-four per cent declared that they were willing to attend a course on CTC.

conclusionGeneral practitioners have limited knowledge concerning CTC. Radiological societies should fill this gap offering dedicated educational initiatives.

Indexed as

Colonography, Computed TomographicGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesColonographyColorectal cancerComputed tomographyMedical educationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID26223828
OpenAlexW956456766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.