Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26223687›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Perception of drinking water safety and factors influencing acceptance and sustainability of a water quality intervention in rural southern India.

Mark Rohit Francis, Guru Nagarajan, Rajiv Sarkar, Venkata Raghava Mohan, Gagandeep Kang, Vinohar Balraj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measuring Human Water Needs.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark Rohit FrancisDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, 632004, India. elysium28@gmail.com.
Guru NagarajanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, 632002, India. guru@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Rajiv SarkarDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, 632004, India. rsarkar@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Venkata Raghava MohanDepartment of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, 632002, India. venkat@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Gagandeep KangDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, 632004, India. gkang@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Vinohar BalrajSociety for Applied Studies, No 14, Natteri Krishnamachari Street, Krishna Nagar, Vellore, 632001, Tamilnadu, India. vinoharbalraj@gmail.com.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INSociety for Applied Studies · IN

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098579/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust IA/E/12/1/500750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcceptance and long-term sustainability of water quality interventions are pivotal to realizing continued health benefits. However, there is limited research attempting to understand the factors that influence compliance to or adoption of such interventions.

methodsEight focus group discussions with parents of young children--including compliant and not compliant households participating in an intervention study, and three key-informant interviews with village headmen were conducted between April and May 2014 to understand perceptions on the effects of unsafe water on health, household drinking water treatment practices, and the factors influencing acceptance and sustainability of an ongoing water quality intervention in a rural population of southern India.

resultsThe ability to recognize health benefits from the intervention, ease of access to water distribution centers and the willingness to pay for intervention maintenance were factors facilitating acceptance and sustainability of the water quality intervention. On the other hand, faulty perceptions on water treatment, lack of knowledge about health hazards associated with drinking unsafe water, false sense of protection from locally available water, resistance to change in taste or odor of water and a lack of support from male members of the household were important factors impeding acceptance and long term use of the intervention.

conclusionThis study highlights the need to effectively involve communities at important stages of implementation for long term success of water quality interventions. Timely research on the factors influencing uptake of water quality interventions prior to implementation will ensure greater acceptance and sustainability of such interventions in low income settings.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterFamily CharacteristicsSocial PerceptionWater QualityWater SupplyAdultChildFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansIndiaMalePovertyRural PopulationDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID26223687
PMCPMC4520261
OpenAlexW1962741993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.