Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26223485›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of behavioral medicine2016

Patients' Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.

Charlotte J Auer, Julia A Glombiewski, Bettina K Doering, Alexander Winkler, Johannes A C Laferton, Elizabeth Broadbent, Winfried Rief

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04502121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Optimization of Cardiac Valve Patients' Expectations - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2020 to 2023Enrolled89ConditionsCardiac Valve DiseaseArmsEXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations
NCT04669379 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Optimization of Patient's Expectations by the Use of an Online-Tool - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2021 to 2022Enrolled29ConditionsPatients Undergoing SurgeryArmsEXPECT: Preoperative optimization of patient's expectations
NCT05402631 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Can Patient Expectations Influence Pain Reduction After Epidural Injections in Patients With Low Back Pain? An Observational Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorOspedale Regionale di LuganoRan2022 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsExpectations, Back Pain, Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, Satisfaction, PatientArmsEpidural Injection, Periradicular Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Does grit and self-control impact outcomes following spine surgery? Early findings from a prospective study evaluating the association between grit and self-control following minimally invasive laminectomy/microdiscectomy and anterior cervical surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Observational
  14. Patients' Experience With Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte J AuerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany. charlotte.auer@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Julia A GlombiewskiDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Bettina K DoeringDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Alexander WinklerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Johannes A C LafertonDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Elizabeth BroadbentFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Winfried RiefDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany. rief@staff.uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies indicate that patients' presurgical expectations can influence postsurgical health outcome. PURPOSE: To estimate the potential for clinical exploitation of this association, a meta-analysis of prospective studies which assess the association between patients' presurgical expectations and postsurgical quality of life is applied to accumulate the overall effect.

methodsWe searched the databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and PsychINFO for English- and German-language articles published from 1980 until December 2013. Additionally, manual searches of bibliographies of retrieved articles and relevant reviews were conducted. Prospective studies measuring presurgical expectations and postsurgical quality of life in patients aging 18-65 were selected. Correlations between presurgical expectations and postsurgical quality of life were extracted or provided by the authors.

resultsThe search yielded 21 prospective studies (including 2611 patients undergoing surgery) with a follow-up period ranging from 1 week to 13 years. The pooled correlations were 0.369 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.264 to 0.466; P for heterogeneity <0.001; random-effects model) for overall quality of life (11 studies), 0.126 (95% CI, 0.079 to 0.172; P for heterogeneity = 0.63; random-effects model) for physical quality of life (12 studies), and 0.208 (95% CI, 0.113 to 0.299; P for heterogeneity <0.001; random-effects model) for mental quality of life (12 studies), indicating low to moderate associations between presurgery patients' expectations and postsurgery quality of life.

conclusionsThese results confirm the importance of patients' expectations in the prediction of postsurgical outcomes and underline the necessity to optimize these expectations in order to improve postoperative quality of life.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAttitude to HealthHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPerioperative PeriodProspective StudiesSurgical Procedures, OperativeExpectationsHealth beliefsQuality of lifeSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.