ReviewClinical neuroradiology2015
Quantitative MR Imaging of Brain Tissue and Brain Pathologies.
Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrafast and robustMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- 3D MR fingerprinting for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of whole mouse brain.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Interictal blood-brain barrier dysfunction in piriform cortex of people with epilepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Quantification and Proximal-to-Distal Distribution Pattern of Tibial Nerve Lesions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis : Assessment by MR Neurography.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Clinical feasibility and validation of the accelerated T2 mapping sequence GRAPPATINI in brain imaging.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary Adult Brain Tumors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- T2 mapping of the peritumoral infiltration zone of glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions: 21 years experiences of a single center.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurement of basic quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) parameters (e.g., relaxation times T1, T2*, T2 or respective rates R (1/T)) corrected for radiofrequency (RF) coil bias yields different conventional and new tissue contrasts as well as volumes for tissue segmentation. This approach also provides quantitative measures of microstructural and functional tissue changes. We herein demonstrate some prospects of quantitative MR imaging in neurological diagnostics and science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26223371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.