ArticleScience translational medicine2015
Drug-induced hearing loss: Infection raises the odds.
Article in Science translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting Novel Ototoxins and Potentiation of Ototoxicity by Disease Settings.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- The relationship between the structure and toxicity of aminoglycoside antibiotics.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2020Review
- Monitoring neonates for ototoxicity.International journal of audiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammation due to bacterial infection exacerbates hearing loss caused by aminoglycoside antibiotic treatment in a mouse model of sepsis (Koo et al.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
26223298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.