Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26223253›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Intratumoral and peritumoral post-irradiation changes, but not viable tumor tissue, may respond to bevacizumab in previously irradiated meningiomas.

Motomasa Furuse, Naosuke Nonoguchi, Shinji Kawabata, Tomo Miyata, Taichiro Toho, Toshihiko Kuroiwa, Shin-Ichi Miyatake

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Motomasa FuruseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. neu054@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp.
Naosuke NonoguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. neu077@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp.
Shinji KawabataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. neu046@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp.
Tomo MiyataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. haveaniceday.tomo@gmail.com.
Taichiro TohoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. neu129@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp.
Toshihiko KuroiwaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. neu040@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp.
Shin-Ichi MiyatakeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. neu070@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp.
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of bevacizumab has not been determined for treatment-refractory meningiomas. We treated meningiomas with low-dose bevacizumab and compared the radiological responses of non-irradiated meningiomas with previously irradiated meningiomas. In addition, we assessed intraparenchymal radiation necrosis following bevacizumab treatment.Six patients with meningiomas (three anaplastic, one atypical, and two grade I) who were previously treated with multiple sessions of radiotherapy and subsequently developed perilesional edema were treated with bevacizumab. Of six patients, two patients with anaplastic meningiomas developed three tumors following radiotherapy, which were defined as non-irradiated tumors. There were 12 pre-existing extra-axial tumors that were previously irradiated. Some of these tumors demonstrated adjacent intraparenchymal contrast enhancement. These tumors were defined as post-irradiated tumors. Four patients had intraparenchymal radiation necrosis. Low-dose bevacizumab was administered biweekly over 3-6 cycles to all patients.Four tumors decreased in contrast-enhanced volume, nine tumors were unchanged, and two tumors progressed. Of the three non-irradiated tumors, two tumors increased in volume (126 % and 198 %) and one tumor was stable (-5 %). The median reduction rates determined by contrast volume were -31 % and -71 % in post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis, respectively. Non-irradiated tumors had a significantly poorer response to bevacizumab than post-irradiated tumors and radiation necrosis (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.0005, respectively, Tukey-Kramer test).Low-dose bevacizumab did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of non-irradiated meningiomas. Responses to low-dose bevacizumab could be related to its effect on post-irradiation changes, rather than its effect on biologically active tumor tissue in post-irradiated meningiomas. Radiological responses to low-dose bevacizumab may distinguish biologically active tumors from post-irradiation changes in progressive meningiomas following radiotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBrain EdemaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID26223253
PMCPMC4520201
OpenAlexW1549951792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.