Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26222828›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Bacterial Respiration and Growth Rates Affect the Feeding Preferences, Brood Size and Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Li Yu, Xiaomei Yan, Chenglong Ye, Haiyan Zhao, Xiaoyun Chen, Feng Hu, Huixin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolites limiting predator growth wane with prey biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cultivation ofJournal of nematology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Wrapping culture plates with Parafilm MBMC research notes · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Control of Germline Stem Cell Lineages by Diet and Physiology.Results and problems in cell differentiation
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li YuSoil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomei YanSoil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Chenglong YeSoil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Haiyan ZhaoCollege of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyun ChenSoil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Feng HuSoil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Huixin LiSoil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria serve as live food and nutrients for bacterial-feeding nematodes (BFNs) in soils, and influence nematodes behavior and physiology through their metabolism. Five bacterial taxa (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens JX1, Variovorax sp. JX14, Bacillus megaterium JX15, Pseudomonas fluorescens Y1 and Escherichia coli OP50) and the typical BFN Caenorhabditis elegans were selected to study the effects of bacterial respiration and growth rates on the feeding preferences, brood size and lifespan of nematodes. P. fluorescens Y1 and E. coli OP50 were found to be more active, with high respiration and rapid growth, whereas B. amyloliquefaciens JX1 and B. megaterium JX15 were inactive. The nematode C. elegans preferred active P. fluorescens Y1 and E. coli OP50 obviously. Furthermore, worms that fed on these two active bacteria produced more offspring but had shorter lifespan, while inactive and less preferred bacteria had increased nematodes lifespan and decreased the brood size. Based on these results, we propose that the bacterial activity may influence the behavior and life traits of C. elegans in the following ways: (1) active bacteria reproduce rapidly and emit high levels of CO2 attracting C. elegans; (2) these active bacteria use more resources in the nematodes' gut to sustain their survival and reproduction, thereby reducing the worm's lifespan; (3) inactive bacteria may provide less food for worms than active bacteria, thus increasing nematodes lifespan but decreasing their fertility. Nematodes generally require a balance between their preferred foods and beneficial foods, only preferred food may not be beneficial for nematodes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaCaenorhabditis elegansFeeding BehaviorLongevitySoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID26222828
PMCPMC4519269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.