Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26222673›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2016

Integrating Molecular Subclassification of Medulloblastomas into Routine Clinical Practice: A Simplified Approach.

Kavneet Kaur, Aanchal Kakkar, Anupam Kumar, Supriya Mallick, Pramod K Julka, Deepak Gupta, Ashish Suri, Vaishali Suri, Mehar C Sharma, Chitra Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Prognostic Value of Amplification of theDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1): a reliable immunohistochemical predictive marker for WNT-activated medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current Strategies for Management of Medulloblastoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic value of microRNA-125a expression status in molecular groups of pediatric medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. O-GlcNAcylation promotes cerebellum development and medulloblastoma oncogenesis via SHH signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kavneet KaurDepartment of Pathology.
Aanchal KakkarDepartment of Pathology.
Anupam KumarDepartment of Pathology.
Supriya MallickDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Pramod K JulkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Deepak GuptaDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashish SuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vaishali SuriDepartment of Pathology.
Mehar C SharmaDepartment of Pathology.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medulloblastoma (MB) is composed of four molecular subgroups viz. WNT, SHH, groups 3 and 4, identified using various high-throughput methods. Translation of this molecular data into pathologist-friendly techniques that would be applicable in laboratories all over the world is a major challenge. Ninety-two MBs were analyzed using a panel of 10 IHC markers, real-time PCR for mRNA and miRNA expression, and FISH for MYC amplification. β-catenin, GAB1 and YAP1 were the only IHC markers of utility in classification of MBs into three subgroups viz. WNT (9.8%), SHH (45.6%) and non-WNT/SHH (44.6%). mRNA expression could further classify some non-WNT/SHH tumors into groups 3 and 4. This, however, was dependent on integrity of RNA extracted from FFPE tissue. MYC amplification was seen in 20% of non-WNT/SHH cases and was associated with the worst prognosis. For routine diagnostic practice, we recommend classification of MBs into three subgroups: WNT, SHH and non-WNT/SHH, with supplementation by prognostic markers like MYC for non-WNT/SHH tumors. Using this panel, we propose a new three-tier risk stratification system for MBs. Molecular subgrouping with this limited panel is rapid, economical, works well on FFPE tissue and is reliable as it correlates significantly with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMedulloblastomaMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorFISHimmunohistochemistrymedulloblastomamolecularsubgroups

Identifiers

PMID26222673
PMCPMC8029101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.