Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26222655›Full record

SynthesisJAMA surgery2015

Patient and Referring Practitioner Characteristics Associated With the Likelihood of Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Luke M Funk, Sally Jolles, Laura E Fischer, Corrine I Voils

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luke M FunkDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison2William S. Middleton Veterans Affairs Memorial Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.
Sally JollesDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison2William S. Middleton Veterans Affairs Memorial Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.
Laura E FischerDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Corrine I VoilsCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina4Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USMemorial Hospital · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAlthough bariatric surgery is the most cost-effective treatment for severe obesity, less than 1% of severely obese patients undergo it. Reasons for this low use are unclear.

objectivesTo identify patient and referring practitioner characteristics associated with the likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2014. Studies were eligible if they presented descriptive data regarding facilitators or barriers to bariatric surgery or if they reported statistical associations between patient or practitioner characteristics and referral to or receipt of bariatric surgery. Frequency effect sizes were calculated as the proportion of studies reporting a finding.

findingsOf the 7212 records identified in the initial search, 53 were included in full-text review. Nine studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in analyses. Of those, 4 included descriptive findings, 6 reported statistical associations, and 1 included both. One study included practitioners as participants, whereas 8 included patients. Four of 9 studies identified an association between female sex and a greater willingness to undergo bariatric surgery. Lack of knowledge about bariatric surgery was a barrier in 2 studies. Five of 9 cited patient concerns about the outcomes and safety of bariatric surgery as a barrier to undergoing it. Patients were more likely to pursue bariatric surgery when it was recommended by referring practitioners. Practitioners who believed that obesity treatment should be covered by insurance were more likely to recommend bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Limited patient and referring practitioner knowledge about the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery are important barriers to bariatric surgery use. Future efforts focused on improving knowledge and identification of the critical determinants of obesity treatment decision making from the practitioner and patient perspectives would have an important effect on public health.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleObesity, MorbidReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID26222655
PMCPMC4992360
OpenAlexW1624701774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.