Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26222266›Full record

ArticleHIV medicine2016

Late presentation to HIV testing is overestimated when based on the consensus definition.

A Sasse, E Florence, A Pharris, S De Wit, P Lacor, D Van Beckhoven, J Deblonde, M-L Delforge, K Fransen, J-C Goffard and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-country study on the impact of a revised consensus definition of late HIV diagnosis, Europe, 2022 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of risk factors associated with national transmission and late presentation of HIV-1, Denmark, 2009 to 2017.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterisation of HIV-1 transmission clusters and drug-resistant mutations in Denmark, 2004 to 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Defining neonatal sepsis.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

A SasseScientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
E FlorenceInstituut Tropische Geneeskunde Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
A PharrisEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
S De WitCHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
P LacorUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
D Van BeckhovenScientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
J DeblondeScientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
M-L DelforgeHôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
K FransenInstituut Tropische Geneeskunde Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
J-C GoffardHôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
J-C LegrandCHU de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
M MoutschenCHU de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
D PiérardUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
J RuelleUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
D VairaCHU de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
B VandercamCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
M Van RanstKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
E Van WijngaerdenKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
L VandekerckhoveUniversitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
C VerhofstedeUniversiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
Belgian Research AIDS & HIV Consortium (BREACH)
Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEKU Leuven · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SEGhent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BEGrand Charleroi Hospital · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2011, a consensus was reached defining "late presenters" (LPs) as individuals presenting for care with a CD4 count < 350 cells/μL or with an AIDS-defining event, regardless of CD4 count. However, a transient low CD4 count is not uncommon in recent infections. The objective of this study was to investigate how measurements of late presentation change if the clinical stage at the time of diagnosis is taken into account.

methodsCase surveillance data for newly diagnosed patients in Belgium in 1998-2012 were analysed, including CD4 count at diagnosis, the presence of AIDS-defining events, and recent infections (< 6 months) as reported by clinicians in the case of acute illness or a recent negative test. First, proportions of LPs were calculated according to the consensus definition. Secondly, LPs were reclassified as "nonlate" if infections were reported as recent.

resultsA total of 7949 HIV diagnoses were included in the study. Recent infections were increasingly reported over time, accounting for 8.2% of new infections in 1998 and 37.5% in 2012. The consideration of clinical stage significantly modified the proportion of LPs: 18.2% of men who have sex with men (MSM) diagnosed in 2012 would be classified as LPs instead of 30.9% using the consensus definition (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients misclassified as LPs increased significantly over time: 5% in MSM in 1998 vs. 41% in 2012.

conclusionsThis study suggests that low CD4 counts in recent infections may lead to overestimation of late presentation when applying the consensus definition. The impact of transient CD4 count on late presentation estimates should be assessed and, if relevant, the introduction of clinical stage in the definition of late presentation should be considered.

Indexed as

BelgiumCD4 Lymphocyte CountConsensus Statements as TopicDelayed DiagnosisHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsAIDSconsensus definitionHIVlate diagnosislate presentationmen who have sex with mentesting

Identifiers

PMID26222266
PMCPMC5034831
OpenAlexW1933930095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.