Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26222184›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Focus on 16p13.3 Locus in Colon Cancer.

Evi Mampaey, Annelies Fieuw, Thalia Van Laethem, Liesbeth Ferdinande, Kathleen Claes, Wim Ceelen, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Piet Pattyn, Marc De Man, Kim De Ruyck and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Peroxiredoxin 1 - an antioxidant enzyme in cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
  7. Unexpected frequency of genomic alterations in histologically normal colonic tissue from colon cancer patients.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evi MampaeyDepartment of Gastroenterology-Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Annelies FieuwDepartment of Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Thalia Van LaethemDepartment of Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Liesbeth FerdinandeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Kathleen ClaesDepartment of Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wim CeelenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Yves Van NieuwenhoveDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Piet PattynDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marc De ManDepartment of Gastroenterology-Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Kim De RuyckDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nadine Van RoyDepartment of Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Karen GeboesDepartment of Gastroenterology-Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Stéphanie LaurentDepartment of Gastroenterology-Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith one million new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed annually in the world, CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the Western world. Patients with stage I-III CRC can be cured with surgery but are at risk for recurrence. Colorectal cancer is characterized by the presence of chromosomal deletions and gains. Large genomic profiling studies have however not been conducted in this disease. The number of a specific genetic aberration in a tumour sample could correlate with recurrence-free survival or overall survival, possibly leading to its use as biomarker for therapeutic decisions. At this point there are not sufficient markers for prediction of disease recurrence in colorectal cancer, which can be used in the clinic to discriminate between stage II patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. For instance, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been most clearly demonstrated in stage III disease with an approximately 30 percent relative reduction in the risk of disease recurrence. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease are less certain, the risk for relapse is much smaller in the overall group and the specific patients at risk are hard to identify. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis (array-CGH) was applied to study high-resolution DNA copy number alterations in 93 colon carcinoma samples. These genomic data were combined with parameters like KRAS mutation status, microsatellite status and clinicopathological characteristics.

resultsBoth large and small chromosomal losses and gains were identified in our sample cohort. Recurrent gains were found for chromosome 1q, 7, 8q, 13 and 20 and losses were mostly found for 1p, 4, 8p, 14, 15, 17p, 18, 21 and 22. Data analysis demonstrated that loss of chromosome 4 is linked to a worse prognosis in our patients series. Besides these alterations, two interesting small regions of overlap were identified, which could be associated with disease recurrence. Gain of the 16p13.3 locus (including the RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog gene, RBFOX1) was linked with a worse recurrence-free survival in our patient cohort. On the other hand, loss of RBFOX1 was only found in patients without disease recurrence. Most interestingly, above mentioned characteristics were also found in stage II patients, for whom there is a high medical need for the identification of new prognostic biomarkers.

conclusionsIn conclusion, copy number variation of the 16p13.3 locus seems to be an important parameter for prediction of disease recurrence in colon cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaChromosome AberrationsColonic NeoplasmsGenetic LociBiomarkers, TumorChromosomes, Human, Pair 16Comparative Genomic HybridizationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene DosageHumansMaleNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA Splicing FactorsBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsRBFOX1 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA Splicing Factors

Identifiers

PMID26222184
PMCPMC4519182
OpenAlexW1534133343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.