Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26221593›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

Novel Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: Monitoring, Reversal and Perioperative Management.

Fadi Shamoun, Hiba Obeid, Harish Ramakrishna

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perioperative management of anticoagulant therapy.Innovative surgical sciences · 2019
    Review
  2. [Perioperative handling of anticoagulation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  3. What's New in Anticoagulation.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fadi ShamounDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Hiba ObeidDamascus University Faculty of Medicine, Damascus, Syria.
Harish RamakrishnaDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USDamascus University · SY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Effective anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of outpatient and inpatient treatment. The use of the new generation of anticoagulants (NOACs) continues to grow. Recently published data indicate their cost-effectiveness and overall safety in stroke prevention; compared to vitamin K antagonists, they can be prescribed in fixed doses for long-term therapy without the need for coagulation monitoring. Both United States and European Guidelines recommend NOACs for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. This review discusses each of the NOACs, along with their efficacy and safety data. It explores the most recent guidelines regarding their perioperative use in atrial fibrillation patients. It also discusses bleeding complications, perioperative management, and reversal agents.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPerioperative CareAdministration, OralAnimalsAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationHumansAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID26221593
PMCPMC4503583
OpenAlexW1604344130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.