Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26221570›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2015

Application of ICA to realistically simulated (1)H-MRS data.

Ravi Kalyanam, David Boutte, Kent E Hutchison, Vince D Calhoun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi KalyanamThe Mind Research Network Albuquerque, New Mexico ; Department of ECE, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico.
David BoutteThe Mind Research Network Albuquerque, New Mexico ; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado.
Kent E HutchisonThe Mind Research Network Albuquerque, New Mexico ; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network Albuquerque, New Mexico ; Department of ECE, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI HANLON, FAITH MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
Multi-group semi-blind ICA of fMRIR01EB000840 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2003 to 2011
$3.2M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR021938NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS 2R01EB000840NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000840NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction(1)H-MRS signals from brain tissues capture information on in vivo brain metabolism and neuronal biomarkers. This study aims to advance the use of independent component analysis (ICA) for spectroscopy data by objectively comparing the performance of ICA and LCModel in analyzing realistic data that mimics many of the known properties of in vivo data.

methodsThis work identifies key features of in vivo (1)H-MRS signals and presents methods to simulate realistic data, using a basis set of 12 metabolites typically found in the human brain. The realistic simulations provide a much needed ground truth to evaluate performances of various MRS analysis methods. ICA is applied to collectively analyze multiple realistic spectra and independent components identified with our generative model to obtain ICA estimates. These same data are also analyzed using LCModel and the comparisons between the ground-truth and the analysis estimates are presented. The study also investigates the potential impact of modeling inaccuracies by incorporating two sets of model resonances in simulations.

resultsThe simulated fid signals incorporating line broadening, noise, and residual water signal closely resemble the in vivo signals. Simulation analyses show that the resolution performances of both LCModel and ICA are not consistent across metabolites and that while ICA resolution can be improved for certain resonances, ICA is as effective as, or better than, LCModel in resolving most model resonances.

conclusionThe results show that ICA can be an effective tool in comparing multiple spectra and complements existing approaches for providing quantified estimates.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdolescentAdultBrainComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWaterYoung AdultWaterLCModel analysisMRS ICAproton spectroscopyrealistic simulationsspectral ICA

Identifiers

PMID26221570
PMCPMC4511286
OpenAlexW2031226485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.