Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26221506›Full record

ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2015

Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous paracetamol/midazolam and fentanyl in preparation of patients for colonoscopy: A double blind randomized clinical trial.

Abbasali Ahmadi, Parviz Amri, Javad Shokri, Karimollah Hajian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abbasali AhmadiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Babol University of Medical Science, Babol, Iran.
Parviz AmriDepartment of Intensive Care, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Javad ShokriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Babol University of Medical Science, Babol, Iran.
Karimollah HajianDepartment of Social Medicine and Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Babol University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough some patients can tolerate colonoscopy procedure using fentanyl/ midazolam without any sedation and analgesic requirements but some patients may require additional sedation with benzodiazepines. We performed the present study to compare the effect of paracetamol/midazolam with fentanyl/ midazolam.

methodsIn a clinical trial, 96 patients aged 18 to 75 years old, who were candidate for elective colonoscopy assigned consecutively into two groups as paracetamol/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam. The first group received 1 gr paracetamol 45 minutes before colonoscopy and 0.5 mg/kg midazolam 5 minutes before colonoscopy whereas the second group received 04- 0.5-1 mcg/kg fentanyl 3 minutes before colonoscopy and similar dose of midazolam. The two groups were compared in regard to patient intensity, discomfort, acolonoscopist and, patient satisfaction and rescue dose of propofol during colonoscopy and vital signs.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups for patient pain score, colonoscopist satisfaction, patient satisfaction and rescue dose of propofol (P=0.817, 0.978, 0.460, and 0.104, respectively). The incidence of apnea was greater in fentanyl group (P=0.045). After adjusting for age and education, there was also no significant difference between the two groups.

conclusionThis study indicates that paracetamol can be considered as an alternative drug regimen in preparation of colonoscopy.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaColonoscopyFentanylParacetamol

Identifiers

PMID26221506
PMCPMC4478457
OpenAlexW1834379845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.