ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
MTHFD1 gene polymorphisms as risk factors involved in orofacial cleft: an independent case-control study and a meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrofacial clefts (OFCs) were among the most familiar birth defects in the world, which had been reported to be influenced by the folic acid ingestion in pregnancy previously. Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase1 (MTHFD1) gene was associated with the susceptibility of OFCs through a complex metabolism correlate with folic acid. The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation of five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within MTHFD1 related to the OFCs risk in a Chinese population.
methodsBy the use of polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), we genotyped 5 filtered SNPs (identified by Haploview 4.2 software with HapMap databases) on MTHFD1 gene: 118913T>C, 31136A>G, 58893A>G, 1958G>A and 61869T>C of 216 subjects (108 OFCs cases and 108 healthy controls) from a Chinese population. The association between these SNPs and OFCs risk was investigated by student t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square test with GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. Furthermore, we also performed a meta-analysis of relevant studies to investigate the association between MTHFD1 1958G>A and the susceptibility of OFCs.
resultsThrough the genotyping, the AA genotype was found significantly correlated with the susceptibility of OFCs compared with other SNPs on MTHFD1, yielding an OR of 2.71 (95% CI = 1.12-6.58, P = 0.025) under the homozygous model and an OR of 2.37 (95% CI = 1.06-5.30, P = 0.033) under the recessive model. While other selected SNPs 118913T>C and 31136A>G were also associated with an increased OFC risk, the results were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). However, the overall result of meta-analysis did not support the conclusion that the 1958G>A variant could be a genetic susceptible factor for OFCs (A allele vs. G allele: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.85-1.23, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.69-1.63, GA vs. GG: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.81-1.27, AA vs. GG+GA: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.61-1.46, AA+GA vs. GG: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.74-1.19).
conclusionsThe MTHFD1 1958G>A variant was significantly associated with the increased OFCs risk in Chinese population. However, this association was not supported by meta-analysis of all relevant studies. Further investigations about functional impact of this polymorphism were needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26221324PMC4509269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.