ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Microarray-based identification of differentially expressed genes in extramammary Paget's disease.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare Localization of Extramammary Paget's Disease in the Axilla: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Extramammary Paget's Disease: Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Treatment with Focus on Recent Developments.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare cutaneous malignancy accounting for approximately 1-2% of vulvar cancers. The rarity of this disease has caused difficulties in characterization and the molecular mechanism underlying EMPD development remains largely unclear. Here we used microarray analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in EMPD of the scrotum comparing with normal epithelium from healthy donors. Agilent single-channel microarray was used to compare the gene expression between 6 EMPD specimens and 6 normal scrotum epithelium samples. A total of 799 up-regulated genes and 723 down-regulated genes were identified in EMPD tissues. Real-time PCR was conducted to verify the differential expression of some representative genes, including ERBB4, TCF3, PAPSS2, PIK3R3, PRLR, SULT1A1, TCF7L1, and CREB3L4. Generally, the real-time PCR results were consistent with microarray data, and the expression of ERBB4, PRLR, TCF3, PIK3R3, SULT1A1, and TCF7L1 was significantly overexpressed in EMPD (P<0.05). Moreover, the overexpression of PRLR in EMPD, a receptor for the anterior pituitary hormone prolactin (PRL), was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. These data demonstrate that the differentially expressed genes from the microarray-based identification are tightly associated with EMPD occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26221264PMC4509209W2244234840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.