ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Current evidence on the relationship between two common polymorphisms in NPAS2 gene and cancer risk.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic variation of clock genes and cancer risk: a field synopsis and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Review
- Gender-specific associations between polymorphisms of the circadian gene RORA and cutaneous melanoma susceptibility.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- A polymorphic GGC repeat in the NPAS2 gene and its association with melanoma.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between neuronal PAS domain protein 2 (NPAS2) gene polymorphisms and cancer risk has been widely investigated. However, the results are conflicting. We performed this meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation on the relationship. We searched Pubmed, and Web of Knowledge databases until Dec, 2014 to identify eligible studies. Case-control studies containing available genotype frequencies of the NPAS2 polymorphisms were chosen. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of association. Eight independent case-control studies with 3,857 cancer patients and 4,525 cancer-free controls were selected for this meta-analysis. Two NPAS2 gene polymorphisms were identified (rs2305160 and rs17024926). The results showed statistically significant associations of rs2305160 with cancer risk (AA+GA vs. GG: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, P = 0.02; AG vs. GG: OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.68-0.96, P = 0.02). Stratified analysis by cancer type indicated that rs2305160 may decrease the risk of breast cancer (A vs. G: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.76-0.96, P = 0.006; AA+GA vs. GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67-0.88, P<0.001; AG vs. GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.64-0.86, P<0.001), whereas negative results were obtained for prostate cancer. For rs17024926 polymorphism, there was no significant association in any genetic model. This meta-analysis suggests that NPAS2 rs2305160 polymorphism may reduce cancer susceptibility, especially in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26221256PMC4509201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.