ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Efficacy of radical and conservative surgery for hepatic cystic echinococcosis: a meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocystectomy as a conservative surgical treatment for hepatic cystic echinococcosis: A systematic review with single-arm meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Radical versus conservative surgical treatment of liver hydatid cysts: a meta-analysis.Frontiers of medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Impact of recurrence of hepatic cystic echinococcosis on postoperative outcomes in an endemic region of Chile: a retrospective cohort study.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
- Article
- Standardized approach to the conservative surgery of hepatic cystic echinococcosis: A prospective study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Risk factors and management of biliary leakage after Endocystectomy for hepatic cystic echinococcosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Differential Activity of Human Leukocyte Extract on Systemic Immune Response and Cyst Growth in Mice withHelminthologia · 2022Article
- [Results of multimodal treatment of hepatic echinococcosis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Article
- Standardized endocystectomy technique for surgical treatment of uncomplicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of radical surgery (RS) and conservative surgery (CS) in the treatment of hepatic cystic echinococcosis (HCE).
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, SCI, CNKI, CBM, and WanFang databases, and the Cochrane Library (2013, Issue 3) for references published before December 2013. Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of radical and conservative surgery for HCE were collected. After the literature was screened in accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted and the quality of methodologies of selected references was determined independently by two evaluators. A meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies with RevMan 5.1 statistical software.
resultsFive non-randomized controlled trials (1267 patients) were included in this study. Patients in the RS group had fewer postoperative complications compared with the CS group [OR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.32, 0.56), P < 0.00001], whereas there was no significant difference in rates of postoperative bile leakage between the two groups [OR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.05, 1.12), P = 0.07]. Postoperative follow-up of patients revealed a significantly lower HCE recurrence rate in the RS versus CS group [OR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.08, 0.38), P < 0.0001]. Additionally, no statistical differences in the number of days of hospitalization [MD = -2.47, 95% CI (-6.42, 1.49), P = 0.22] and perioperative mortality [OR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.27, 2.79), P = 0.82] were identified between groups.
conclusionRS, especially total pericystectomy, has obvious advantages over CS: fewer complications, lower postoperative recurrence, and a lower incidence of biliary fistula and infection, making RS the preferred surgical method. This conclusion requires further validation with high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes. Surgical approach should be based upon comprehensive assessment of individual circumstances in HCE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26221241PMC4509186W2407024867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.