ArticleBiomicrofluidics2015
Simultaneous diamagnetic and magnetic particle trapping in ferrofluid microflows via a single permanent magnet.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient Particle Capture and Release Method for DNA Library Preparation on Microfluidics.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Enhanced microfluidic multi-target separation by positive and negative magnetophoresis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tunable hydrodynamic focusing with dual-neodymium magnet-based microfluidic separation device.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Magnetically driven microfluidics for isolation of circulating tumor cells.Cancer medicine · 2020Review
- Recent Advances in Continuous-Flow Particle Manipulations Using Magnetic Fluids.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Dual-neodymium magnet-based microfluidic separation device.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Tumor antigen-independent and cell size variation-inclusive enrichment of viable circulating tumor cells.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Recent advances and current challenges in magnetophoresis based micro magnetofluidics.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Review
- Yeast cell fractionation by morphology in dilute ferrofluids.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- Magnetofluidic concentration and separation of non-magnetic particles using two magnet arrays.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Label-Free Microfluidic Manipulation of Particles and Cells in Magnetic Liquids.Advanced functional materials · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trapping and preconcentrating particles and cells for enhanced detection and analysis are often essential in many chemical and biological applications. Existing methods for diamagnetic particle trapping require the placement of one or multiple pairs of magnets nearby the particle flowing channel. The strong attractive or repulsive force between the magnets makes it difficult to align and place them close enough to the channel, which not only complicates the device fabrication but also restricts the particle trapping performance. This work demonstrates for the first time the use of a single permanent magnet to simultaneously trap diamagnetic and magnetic particles in ferrofluid flows through a T-shaped microchannel. The two types of particles are preconcentrated to distinct locations of the T-junction due to the induced negative and positive magnetophoretic motions, respectively. Moreover, they can be sequentially released from their respective trapping spots by simply increasing the ferrofluid flow rate. In addition, a three-dimensional numerical model is developed, which predicts with a reasonable agreement the trajectories of diamagnetic and magnetic particles as well as the buildup of ferrofluid nanoparticles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.