ArticleTanaffos2015
Efficacy of Low-Dose Ciclesonide and Fluticasone Propionate for Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma.
Article in Tanaffos, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishing the best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids: the EINSTEIN systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis using individual participant data.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ciclesonide (80 mg/day) and fluticasone propionate (200 mg/day) for mild to moderate persistent asthma. MATERIALS AND
methodsFemale and male patients older than 12 years with a history of persistent bronchial asthma for at least 6 months were enrolled. Patients were eligible to enter into a 2-week run-in period before randomization (baseline) if they had received inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone propionate 250 μg/day or equivalent) at a constant dose during the last 4 weeks before the run-in period. In order to enter into the double blind 18-week treatment period, patients had to have a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of 61-90% of predicted and a decrease in FEV1 throughout the run-in period of more than 10%. Patients (n =230) were assigned to ciclesonide 80 mg once daily or fluticasone propionate 100 mg twice daily group. The primary outcome variable was change in FEV1 compared to its baseline value. Secondary outcome variables were asthma-specific quality of life and asthma control.
resultsBoth drugs significantly increased FEV1 and other lung function parameters compared to baseline (P< 0.0001, both groups, all variables). Progress in the percentage of days with no asthma symptoms and no use of rescue medication and asthma-specific quality of life were similar in the two treatment groups.
conclusionCiclesonide at a dose of 80 μg once daily can provide efficient maintenance therapy for mild to moderate persistent asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26221146PMC4515324W967098019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.