Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26220936›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

What Fraction of Duplicates Observed in Recently Sequenced Genomes Is Segregating and Destined to Fail to Fix?

Ashley I Teufel, Joanna Masel, David A Liberles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley I TeufelDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics and Department of Biology, Temple University.
Joanna MaselDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona.
David A LiberlesDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics and Department of Biology, Temple University daliberles@temple.edu.

Funding

THE CONVERSION OF NONCODING SEQUENCES INTO PROTEINSR01GM104040 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CORDES, MATTHEW HJ, MASEL, JOANNA · 2013 to 2016
$839k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most sequenced eukaryotic genomes show a large excess of recent duplicates. As duplicates age, both the population genetic process of failed fixation and the mutation-driven process of nonfunctionalization act to reduce the observed number of duplicates. Understanding the processes generating the age distributions of recent duplicates is important to also understand the role of duplicate genes in the functional divergence of genomes. To date, mechanistic models for duplicate gene retention only account for the mutation-driven nonfunctionalization process. Here, a neutral model for the distribution of synonymous substitutions in duplicated genes which are segregating and expected to never fix in a population is introduced. This model enables differentiation of neutral loss due to failed fixation from loss due to mutation-driven nonfunctionalization. The model has been validated on simulated data and subsequent analysis with the model on genomic data from human and mouse shows that conclusions about the underlying mechanisms for duplicate gene retention can be sensitive to consideration of population genetic processes.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenomeGenomicsHumansMiceModels, Geneticcopy number variationfixationgene duplicationnonfunctionalization

Identifiers

PMID26220936
PMCPMC4558857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.