Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26220893›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society2016

Psychometric investigation of benefit finding among long-term cancer survivors using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Salene M W Jones, Rebecca Ziebell, Rod Walker, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Borsika A Rabin, Stephanie Nutt, Monica Fujii, Jessica Chubak

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reproductive concerns in young women with cervical cancer: latent profiles and key influencing factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Cancer Survivors' Reported Discussions with Health Care Providers About Follow-Up Care and Receipt of Written Care Plans.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of worry about cancer to benefit finding and functioning in long-term cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Salene M W JonesGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: wu.582@osu.edu.
Rebecca ZiebellGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rod WalkerGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Larissa NekhlyudovHarvard Medical School, Department Population Medicine, 133 Brookline Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Borsika A RabinDepartment of Family Medicine and Colorado Health Outcomes Program, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, USA; Department of Community and Behavior Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, USA; Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Stephanie NuttLIVESTRONG Foundation, Austin, TX, USA.
Monica FujiiGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jessica ChubakGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USColorado School of Public Health · USHarvard University · USLivestrong Foundation · US

Funding

CRN4: Cancer Research Resources & Collaboration in Integrated Health Care SystemsU24CA171524 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2012 to 2016
$16.0M
Health Care Improvement for Aging WomenT32AG027677 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
SURVEILLANCE EPIDEMIOLOGY &END RESULTS PROGRAMN01CN067009 · CN · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMAS, DAVID B · 1996 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS N01 CN067009NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035142NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-35142NCI NIH HHS U24 CA171524NCI NIH HHS U24CA171524NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBenefit finding has been shown to be beneficial for people with cancer and may be an indication that one is coping adequately with the stress of cancer. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a four-item benefit finding measure from the cancer survivorship supplement of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

methodsLong-term survivors (5-10 years post-diagnosis) of breast, prostate, colorectal or lung cancer or melanoma (n = 594) completed the MEPS cancer supplement survey in 2013. Four items asked about benefit finding after the cancer: stronger person, coping better, positive changes and having healthier habits. Information on sociodemographics, disease and activity limitations after the cancer was also collected. We examined factor structure, reliability (Kuder-Richardson 20) and validity.

resultsThe four benefit finding items did not appear to measure one factor. Three of the benefit finding items (stronger person, coping better, positive changes) were related to gender, receipt of chemotherapy and activity limitations but not cancer stage, time since diagnosis or income. Having healthier habits was unrelated to any sociodemographic or disease variable.

conclusionsThree of the items (stronger person, coping better, positive changes) appeared to have validity as they were related to variables that literature has shown are related to benefit finding. However, having healthier habits is likely measuring a separate but related construct. This short instrument may be used in future studies assessing benefit finding post cancer; however, the four items should be analyzed separately.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsUnited StatesBenefit findingCancerPosttraumatic growthPsychometric

Identifiers

PMID26220893
PMCPMC4706808
OpenAlexW974737271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.