Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26220666›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Trend in major neonatal and maternal morbidities accompanying the rise in the cesarean delivery rate.

Sivan Zuarez-Easton, Eliezer Shalev, Raed Salim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk factors for persistent disability in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sivan Zuarez-EastonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Eliezer Shalev1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel [2] Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Raed Salim1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel [2] Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to explore a cesarean delivery rate (CDR) beyond which major neonatal and maternal morbidities may outweigh the benefits of the procedure itself. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted at a single university teaching hospital between 1993 and 2012. Pregnant women who delivered at a gestational age of 23 weeks or more were included. Data including delivery mode, brachial plexus injury (BPI), neonatal encephalopathy (NE), placenta accreta (PA), blood transfusion (BT), and cesarean hysterectomy (CH) for each year were extracted, plotted, and trends analyzed. The Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was used to identify trends and correlations. Overall, 83,806 deliveries took place during this period. CDR increased from 10.9% to 21.7% (p < 0.001). Significant decreases in the incidence of BPI (p < 0.001) and NE (p = 0.006) were observed. At CDRs of 13.6% and 20%, there was no further significant decrease in the incidence of BPI and NE, respectively. The incidence of BT increased significantly (p < 0.001) while the increase in the incidence of PA was not significant (p = 0.06) nor the change in the incidence of CH (p = 0.4). A CDR of 20% may still confirm additional beneficial effect on major perinatal morbidities without a significant increase in the incidence of PA.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26220666
PMCPMC4518227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.