ArticleAnnals of botany2015
Plant defence as a complex and changing phenotype throughout ontogeny.
Article in Annals of botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Signaling defenses with color: a meta-analysis of leaf color variation, palatability, and herbivore damage.The New phytologist · 2025Pooled it
- The Price of the Induced Defense Against Pests: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Trichome density and herbivore behaviour on tomato is influenced by herbivory, plant age, and leaf surface.AoB PLANTS · 2025Article
- The role of the Golden2-like (GLK) transcription factor in regulating terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus.Plant cell reports · 2024Article
- Camouflaged plants are shorter than non-camouflaged plants in the alpine zone.Biology letters · 2023Article
- The phenomenon of red and yellow autumn leaves: Hypotheses, agreements and disagreements.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Review
- Article
- Disentangling biotic and abiotic drivers of intraspecific trait variation in woody plant seedlings at forest edges.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- The genetic architecture and evolution of life-history divergence among perennials in theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Growing up aspen: ontogeny and trade-offs shape growth, defence and reproduction in a foundation species.Annals of botany · 2021Article
- Anti-Herbivore Activity of Oregonin, a Diarylheptanoid Found in Leaves and Bark of Red Alder (Alnus rubra).Journal of chemical ecology · 2021Article
- Article
- Plant ontogeny determines strength and associated plant fitness consequences of plant-mediated interactions between herbivores and flower visitors.The Journal of ecology · 2020Article
- Developmental constraints and resource environment shape early emergence and investment in spines in saplings.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Cultivar Variation in Tomato Seed Coat Permeability Is an Important Determinant of Jasmonic Acid Elicited Defenses Against Western Flower Thrips.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Role of cyanogenic glycosides in the seeds of wild lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus: defense, plant nutrition or both?Planta · 2019Article
- Leaf metabolic signatures induced by real and simulated herbivory in black mustard (Brassica nigra).Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2019Article
- Ontogenetic trajectories of direct and indirect defenses of myrmecophytic plants colonized either by mutualistic or opportunistic ant species.Oecologia · 2019Article
- Testing the Distraction Hypothesis: Do extrafloral nectaries reduce ant-pollinator conflict?The Journal of ecology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsOntogenetic changes in anti-herbivore defences are common and result from variation in resource availability and herbivore damage throughout plant development. However, little is known about the simultaneous changes of multiple defences across the entire development of plants, and how such changes affect plant damage in the field. The aim of this study was to assess if changes in the major types of plant resistance and tolerance can explain natural herbivore damage throughout plant ontogeny.
methodsAn assessment was made of how six defensive traits, including physical, chemical and biotic resistance, simultaneously change across the major transitions of plant development, from seedlings to reproductive stages of Turnera velutina growing in the greenhouse. In addition, an experiment was performed to assess how plant tolerance to artificial damage to leaves changed throughout ontogeny. Finally, leaf damage by herbivores was evaluated in a natural population. KEY
resultsThe observed ontogenetic trajectories of all defences were significantly different, sometimes showing opposite directions of change. Whereas trichome density, leaf toughness, extrafloral nectary abundance and nectar production increased, hydrogen cyanide and compensatory responses decreased throughout plant development, from seedlings to reproductive plants. Only water content was higher at the intermediate juvenile ontogenetic stages. Surveys in a natural population over 3 years showed that herbivores consumed more tissue from juvenile plants than from younger seedlings or older reproductive plants. This is consistent with the fact that juvenile plants were the least defended stage.
conclusionsThe results suggest that defensive trajectories are a mixed result of predictions by the Optimal Defence Theory and the Growth-Differentiation Balance Hypothesis. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating multiple defences and plant ontogeny into further studies for a more comprehensive understanding of plant defence evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.