Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26220453›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2016

Poromicromechanics reveals that physiological bone strains induce osteocyte-stimulating lacunar pressure.

Stefan Scheiner, Peter Pivonka, Christian Hellmich

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Direct Assessment of Rabbit Cortical Bone Basic Multicellular Unit Longitudinal Erosion Rate: A 4D Synchrotron-Based Approach.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan ScheinerInstitute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, TU Wien-Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/202, A-1040, Vienna, Austria. stefan.scheiner@tuwien.ac.at.
Peter PivonkaSt. Vincent's Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Clinical Science Building, 29 Regent Street, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Christian HellmichInstitute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, TU Wien-Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/202, A-1040, Vienna, Austria.
TU Wien · ATSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AU

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical loads which are macroscopically acting onto bony organs, are known to influence the activities of biological cells located in the pore spaces of bone, in particular so the signaling and production processes mediated by osteocytes. The exact mechanisms by which osteocytes are actually able to "feel" the mechanical loading and changes thereof, has been the subject of numerous studies, and, while several hypotheses have been brought forth over time, this topic has remained a matter of debate. Relaxation times reported in a recent experimental study of Gardinier et al. (Bone 46(4):1075-1081, 2010) strongly suggest that the lacunar pores are likely to experience, during typical physiological load cycles, not only fluid transport, but also undrained conditions. The latter entail the buildup of lacunar pore pressures, which we here quantify by means of a thorough multiscale modeling approach. In particular, the proposed model is based on classical poroelasticity theory, and able to account for multiple pore spaces. First, the model reveals distinct nonlinear dependencies of the resulting lacunar (and vascular) pore pressures on the underlying bone composition, highlighting the importance of a rigorous multiscale approach for appropriate computation of the aforementioned pore pressures. Then, the derived equations are evaluated for macroscopic (uniaxial as well as hydrostatic) mechanical loading of physiological magnitude. The resulting model-predicted pore pressures agree very well with the pressures that have been revealed, by means of in vitro studies, to be of adequate magnitude for modulating the responses of biological cells, including osteocytes. This underlines that osteocytes may respond to many types of loading stimuli at the same time, in particular so to fluid flow and hydrostatic pressure.

Indexed as

PressureAgingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesCattleHip JointHumansHydrostatic PressureMice, Inbred C57BLOsteocytesPorosityRatsStress, MechanicalWalkingWeight-BearingBone remodelingHydrostatic pressureMechanosensingMicromechanicsOsteocytesPoroelasticity

Identifiers

PMID26220453
PMCPMC4779462
OpenAlexW1913527393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.