ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2015
Newer Diagnostic Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Children.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Hepatorenal Index in Pediatric Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Editorial: Old Problems and New Solutions in Pediatric Pulmonology.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been well recognized that the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children is often compromised by non-specific symptoms, paucibacillary nature of the disease, and the difficulty in collecting the specimen. Consequently, most tuberculosis cases in children are not confirmed, due to which the estimation of the global burden of tuberculosis in children may be inaccurate. There has also been a common misperception that diagnosis of tuberculosis and collecting respiratory specimen in children is always difficult. Because of this, microbiological confirmation of tuberculosis in young children is not routinely attempted in most endemic areas. With the emergence of HIV-related tuberculosis disease and drug-resistant tuberculosis, the availability of accurate, rapid and child friendly diagnostic tools to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimen are urgently required in endemic settings. There have been a large number of studies evaluating new diagnostic tests for tuberculosis in the past decade, but few have been evaluated in children. This review will address the developments in respiratory specimen collection and laboratory diagnostic tests of tuberculosis, with a focus on those that have been evaluated in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.