Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26220111›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2015

Evaluating gestational weight gain recommendations in pregestational diabetes.

Anne M Siegel, Alan Tita, Joseph R Biggio, Lorie M Harper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anne M SiegelDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: asiegel@uabmc.edu.
Alan TitaDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.
Joseph R BiggioDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.
Lorie M HarperDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI W Timothy GARVEY · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
OB/GYN FACULTY RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMK12HD001258 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JENKINS, TODD R · 1999 to 2019
$5.6M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001258NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Institute of Medicine (IOM) does not provide recommendations for gestational weight gain (GWG) specific to women with pregestational diabetes. We aimed to assess the impact of GWG outside the IOM recommendations on perinatal outcomes. STUDY

designWe performed a retrospective cohort study of all singletons with pregestational diabetes from 2008 through 2013. Women were classified as GWG within, less than, or greater than IOM recommendations for body mass index per week of pregnancy. Maternal outcomes examined were cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and percentage of visits with glycemic control (>50% blood sugars at goal). Neonatal outcomes were birthweight, small for gestational age (<10th percentile), large for gestational age (LGA) (>90th percentile), macrosomia (>4000 g), preterm delivery (<37 weeks), and birth injury (shoulder dystocia, fracture, brachial plexus injury, cephalohematoma). Groups were compared using analysis of variance and χ(2) test, as appropriate. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding factors.

resultsOf 340 subjects, 37 (10.9%) were within, 64 (18.8%) less than, and 239 (70.3%) greater than IOM recommendations. The incidence of cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, glycemic control, preterm delivery, and birth injury were not significantly different between GWG groups. The incidence of LGA and macrosomia increased as GWG category increased (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-8.39 and AOR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.16-13.9, respectively) without decreasing the incidence of small for gestational age (AOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.10-1.19). Increases in the risk in LGA and macrosomia were not explained by differences in glycemic control by GWG groups.

conclusionWomen with pregestational diabetes mellitus should be counseled to gain within the IOM recommendations to avoid LGA and macrosomic newborns.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pregnancy in DiabeticsWeight GainAdultBirth InjuriesBlood GlucoseCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLogistic ModelsPractice Guidelines as TopicBlood Glucosegestational weight gainpregestational diabetespregnancytype 1 diabetestype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID26220111
PMCPMC4863643
OpenAlexW2029164199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.