Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26220097›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2015

Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol.

Nelly D Oelke, Esther Suter, Maria Alice Dias da Silva Lima, Cheryl Van Vliet-Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Influence of Selected Indicators of Healthcare System Functioning Evaluation on the Health Result.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nelly D OelkeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Okanagan 3333 University Way, Kelowna, British Columbia, V1V 1V7, Canada. nelly.oelke@ubc.ca.
Esther SuterWorkforce Research & Evaluation, Alberta Health Services, 10301 Southport Lane SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2W 1S7, Canada. esther.suter@albertahealthservices.ca.
Maria Alice Dias da Silva LimaEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua São Manoel, 963, Porto Alegre, Brazil. malice@enf.ufrgs.br.
Cheryl Van Vliet-BrownSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Okanagan 3333 University Way, Kelowna, British Columbia, V1V 1V7, Canada. cheryl.vvbrown@ubc.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth system integration is a key component of health system reform with the goal of improving outcomes for patients, providers, and the health system. Although health systems continue to strive for better integration, current delivery of health services continues to be fragmented. A key gap in the literature is the lack of information on what successful integration looks like and how to measure achievement towards an integrated system. This multi-site study protocol builds on a prior knowledge synthesis completed by two of the primary investigators which identified 10 key principles that collectively support health system integration. The aim is to answer two research questions: What are appropriate indicators for each of the 10 key integration principles developed in our previous knowledge synthesis and what measurement tools are used to measure these indicators? To enhance generalizability of the findings, a partnership between Canada and Brazil was created as health system integration is a priority in both countries and they share similar contexts. METHODS/

designThis knowledge synthesis will follow an iterative scoping review process with emerging information from knowledge-user engagement leading to the refinement of research questions and study selection. This paper describes the methods for each phase of the study. Research questions were developed with stakeholder input. Indicator identification and prioritization will utilize a modified Delphi method and patient/user focus groups. Based on priority indicators, a search of the literature will be completed and studies screened for inclusion. Quality appraisal of relevant studies will be completed prior to data extraction. Results will be used to develop recommendations and key messages to be presented through integrated and end-of-grant knowledge translation strategies with researchers and knowledge-users from the three jurisdictions. DISCUSSION: This project will directly benefit policy and decision-makers by providing an easy accessible set of indicators and tools to measure health system integration across different contexts and cultures. Being able to evaluate the success of integration strategies and initiatives will lead to better health system design and improved health outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Comprehensive Health CareDelivery of Health CareKnowledgeQuality Indicators, Health CareTranslational Research, BiomedicalBrazilCanadaDecision MakingHealth PolicyHumansResearch DesignReview Literature as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26220097
PMCPMC4518647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.