Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26219230›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

Mapping and recombination analysis of two moth colour mutations, Black moth and Wild wing spot, in the silkworm Bombyx mori.

K Ito, S Katsuma, S Kuwazaki, A Jouraku, T Fujimoto, K Sahara, Y Yasukochi, K Yamamoto, H Tabunoki, T Yokoyama and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A long noncoding RNA at theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. A micro-RNA is the effector gene of a classic evolutionary hotspot locus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. eLife · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

K ItoDepartment of Science of Biological Production, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
S KatsumaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
S KuwazakiDivision of Insect Sciences, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
A JourakuDivision of Insect Sciences, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
T FujimotoFaculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
K SaharaFaculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
Y YasukochiDivision of Insect Sciences, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
K YamamotoDivision of Insect Sciences, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
H TabunokiDepartment of Science of Biological Production, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
T YokoyamaDepartment of Science of Biological Production, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
K Kadono-OkudaDivision of Insect Sciences, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
T ShimadaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-0000
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences · JPTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPIwate University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many lepidopteran insects exhibit body colour variations, where the high phenotypic diversity observed in the wings and bodies of adults provides opportunities for studying adaptive morphological evolution. In the silkworm Bombyx mori, two genes responsible for moth colour mutation, Bm and Ws, have been mapped to 0.0 and 14.7 cM of the B. mori genetic linkage group 17; however, these genes have not been identified at the molecular level. We performed positional cloning of both genes to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that underlie the moth wing- and body-colour patterns in B. mori. We successfully narrowed down Bm and Ws to ~2-Mb-long and 100-kb-long regions on the same scaffold Bm_scaf33. Gene prediction analysis of this region identified 77 candidate genes in the Bm region, whereas there were no candidate genes in the Ws region. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis in Bm mutant detected chromosome inversion, which explains why there are no recombination in the corresponding region. The comparative genomic analysis demonstrated that the candidate regions of both genes shared synteny with a region associated with wing- and body-colour variations in other lepidopteran species including Biston betularia and Heliconius butterflies. These results suggest that the genes responsible for wing and body colour in B. mori may be associated with similar genes in other Lepidoptera.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic LinkageWings, AnimalAnimalsBombyxGenes, InsectIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMutationPhenotypePigmentationRecombination, GeneticSynteny

Identifiers

PMID26219230
PMCPMC4675873
OpenAlexW947219251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.