Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218925›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Clinical Specimen-Direct LAMP: A Useful Tool for the Surveillance of blaOXA-23-Positive Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Norihisa Yamamoto, Shigeto Hamaguchi, Yukihiro Akeda, Pitak Santanirand, Anusak Kerdsin, Masafumi Seki, Yoshikazu Ishii, Wantana Paveenkittiporn, Robert A Bonomo, Kazunori Oishi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Development of an RT-LAMP Assay for DetectingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rapid screening and early precautions for carbapenem-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Surveillance of Dihydropteroate Synthase Genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Norihisa YamamotoDivision of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Clinical Research on Infectious Diseases, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeto HamaguchiDivision of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Clinical Research on Infectious Diseases, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yukihiro AkedaDivision of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Clinical Research on Infectious Diseases, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Pitak SantanirandFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anusak KerdsinGeneral Bacteriology Section, National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Masafumi SekiDivision of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshikazu IshiiDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
Wantana PaveenkittipornGeneral Bacteriology Section, National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Robert A BonomoResearch Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Kazunori OishiLaboratory of Clinical Research on Infectious Diseases, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kumthorn MalathumFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kazunori TomonoDivision of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University · JPMinistry of Public Health · THRamathibodi Hospital · THLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare-associated infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment is increasingly complicated by the escalating incidence of antimicrobial resistance. Among drug-resistant pathogens, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) is of increasing concern because of the limited applicable therapies and its expanding global distribution in developed countries and newly industrialized countries. Therefore, a rapid detection method that can be used even in resource-poor countries is urgently required to control this global public health threat. Conventional techniques, such as bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are insufficient to combat this threat because they are time-consuming and laborious. In this study, we developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for detecting blaOXA-23-positive CRAb, the most prevalent form of CRAb in Asia, especially in Thailand, and confirmed its efficacy as a surveillance tool in a clinical setting. Clinical samples of sputum and rectal swabs were collected from patients in a hospital in Bangkok and used for LAMP assays. After boiling and centrifugation, the supernatants were used directly in the assay. In parallel, a culture method was used for comparison purposes to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of LAMP. As a first step, a total of 120 sputum samples were collected. The sensitivity of LAMP was 88.6% (39/44), and its specificity was 92.1% (70/76) using the culture method as the "gold standard". When surveillance samples including sputum and rectal swabs were analyzed with the LAMP assay, its sensitivity was 100.0%. This method enables the direct analysis of clinical specimens and provides results within 40 minutes of sample collection, making it a useful tool for surveillance even in resource-poor countries.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter Infectionsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesThailandbeta-lactamase OXA-23beta-LactamasesCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID26218925
PMCPMC4517775
OpenAlexW1661681884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.