Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218858›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2015

Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy increases the total hospital stay compared to an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Benjamin Menahem, Andrea Mulliri, Audrey Fohlen, Lydia Guittet, Arnaud Alves, Jean Lubrano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04405713 (Assessment of Different Timing for Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calcular Cholecystitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04405713 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Different Timing for Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calcular Cholecystitis (Multicentric Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled900ConditionsAcute CholecystitisArmsfrom the onset of symptoms within the first 3 days, : from the onset of symptoms within the 4-7 days, from the onset of symptoms beyond 7 days
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Timing of cholecystectomy in recurrent attacks of acute cholecystitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improved outcomes for index cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis following a dedicated emergency surgery and trauma service (ESAT).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin MenahemDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.
Andrea MulliriDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.
Audrey FohlenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.
Lydia GuittetCancers and Prevention Laboratory, Research Department, University Hospital of Caen INSERM U 1086, Centre François Baclesse, Caen Cedex, France.
Arnaud AlvesDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.
Jean LubranoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.
Université de Caen Normandie · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to review the available prospective, randomized, controlled trials to determine whether an early (ELC) or a delayed (DLC) approach to a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with an increase in length of hospitalization after acute cholecystitis.

methodsMedline, the Cochrane Trials Register and EMBASE were searched for prospective, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ELC versus DLC, published up to May 2014. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.0.

resultsNine RCTs were included in a total of 617 who underwent ELC and 603 patients who underwent DLC after acute cholecystitis. The mean hospital stay was 5.4 days in the ELC group and 9.1 days in the DLC group. The meta-analysis showed a mean hospital stay significantly lower in the ELC group [medical doctor (MD) = 3.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.95-4.54, P < 0.001]. The major biliary duct injury rate in the ELC group was 0.8% (2/247) and 0.9% (2/223) in the DLC group. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the ELC and DLC groups [relative risk (RR) =0.96, 95%CI = 0.25-3.73, P = 0.950].

conclusionDLC is associated with a longer total hospital stay but equivalent morbidity as compared to ELC for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. ELC would appear to be the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ELC.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteHumansLength of StayTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26218858
PMCPMC4571752
OpenAlexW1491396704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.