Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218832›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

An Effective Approach for Clustering InhA Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Using Substrate-Binding Cavity Features.

Renata De Paris, Christian V Quevedo, Duncan D A Ruiz, Osmar Norberto de Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Extended Quality (eQual): Radial Threshold Clustering Based onJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unveiling the Anti-Cancer Potential of Onoceranoid Triterpenes fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renata De ParisGrupo de Pesquisa em Inteligência de Negócio-GPIN, Faculdade de Informática, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681-Prédio 32, sala 628, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Christian V QuevedoGrupo de Pesquisa em Inteligência de Negócio-GPIN, Faculdade de Informática, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681-Prédio 32, sala 628, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Duncan D A RuizGrupo de Pesquisa em Inteligência de Negócio-GPIN, Faculdade de Informática, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681-Prédio 32, sala 628, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Osmar Norberto de SouzaLaboratório de Bioinformática, Modelagem e Simulação de Biossistemas-LABIO, Faculdade de Informática, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681- Building 32, Room 602, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein receptor conformations, obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, have become a promising treatment of its explicit flexibility in molecular docking experiments applied to drug discovery and development. However, incorporating the entire ensemble of MD conformations in docking experiments to screen large candidate compound libraries is currently an unfeasible task. Clustering algorithms have been widely used as a means to reduce such ensembles to a manageable size. Most studies investigate different algorithms using pairwise Root-Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) values for all, or part of the MD conformations. Nevertheless, the RMSD only may not be the most appropriate gauge to cluster conformations when the target receptor has a plastic active site, since they are influenced by changes that occur on other parts of the structure. Hence, we have applied two partitioning methods (k-means and k-medoids) and four agglomerative hierarchical methods (Complete linkage, Ward's, Unweighted Pair Group Method and Weighted Pair Group Method) to analyze and compare the quality of partitions between a data set composed of properties from an enzyme receptor substrate-binding cavity and two data sets created using different RMSD approaches. Ensembles of representative MD conformations were generated by selecting a medoid of each group from all partitions analyzed. We investigated the performance of our new method for evaluating binding conformation of drug candidates to the InhA enzyme, which were performed by cross-docking experiments between a 20 ns MD trajectory and 20 different ligands. Statistical analyses showed that the novel ensemble, which is represented by only 0.48% of the MD conformations, was able to reproduce 75% of all dynamic behaviors within the binding cavity for the docking experiments performed. Moreover, this new approach not only outperforms the other two RMSD-clustering solutions, but it also shows to be a promising strategy to distill biologically relevant information from MD trajectories, especially for docking purposes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisMolecular Dynamics SimulationBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesMolecular Docking SimulationNADOxidoreductasesProtein ConformationBacterial ProteinsInhA protein, MycobacteriumNADOxidoreductases

Identifiers

PMID26218832
PMCPMC4517875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.