Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218748›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

p21-Activated Kinases 1, 2 and 4 in Endometrial Cancers: Effects on Clinical Outcomes and Cell Proliferation.

Michelle K Y Siu, Daniel S H Kong, Sheila Y P Ngai, Hoi Yan Chan, Lili Jiang, Esther S Y Wong, Stephanie S Liu, Karen K L Chan, Hextan Y S Ngan, Annie N Y Cheung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lipidomic profiling of endometrial cancer using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle K Y SiuDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Daniel S H KongDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Sheila Y P NgaiDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Hoi Yan ChanDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Lili JiangDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Esther S Y WongDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Stephanie S LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Karen K L ChanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Hextan Y S NganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Annie N Y CheungDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p21-activated kinases (Paks) are serine/threonine protein kinases involved in biological events linked to malignant tumor progression. In this study, expression of Pak1, p-Pak2 Ser20, Pak4, pPak4 Ser474 in 21 normal endometrium, 16 hyperplastic endometrium without atypia, 17 atypical complex hyperplasia and 67 endometrial cancers was assessed by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinicopathological parameters. We also accessed the proliferative role and downstream targets of Pak1 in endometrial cancer. Pak1 was expressed in cytoplasm whereas Pak4 and p-Pak4 were expressed in both cytoplasm and nucleus of endometrial tissues. In normal endometrium, significantly higher Pak1 (P = 0.028) and cytoplasmic p-Pak2 (P = 0.048) expression was detected in proliferative endometrium than secretory endometrium. Pak1, cytoplasmic and nuclear Pak4 and nuclear p-Pak4 was significantly overexpressed in endometrial cancer when compared to atrophic endometrium (all P<0.05). Moreover, type I endometrioid carcinomas showed significantly higher Pak1 expression than type II non-endometrioid carcinomas (P<0.001). On the other hand, Pak1, Pak4 and p-Pak4 expression negatively correlated with histological grade (all P<0.05) while p-Pak2 and cytoplasmic Pak4 expression inversely correlated with myometrial invasion (all P<0.05). Furthermore, patients with endometrial cancers with lower cytoplasmic Pak4 expression showed poorer survival (P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis showed cytoplasmic Pak4 is an independent prognostic factor. Functionally, knockdown of Pak1, but not Pak4, in endometrial cancer cell line led to reduced cell proliferation along with reduced cyclin D1, estrogen receptor (ERα) and progestogen receptor (PR) expression. Significant correlation between Pak1 and PR expression was also detected in clinical samples. Our findings suggest that Pak1 and cytoplasmic p-Pak2 may promote cell proliferation in normal endometrium during menstral cycle. Pak1, cytoplasmic and nuclear Pak4 and nuclear p-Pak4 are involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer especially in postmenopausal women. Pak1 promote endometrial cancer cell proliferation, particular in type I endometrioid carcinoma. Cytoplasmic Pak4 can be potential prognostic marker in endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCytoplasmEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle Agedp21-Activated KinasesPhosphorylationYoung Adultp21-Activated KinasesPAK1 protein, humanPAK2 protein, humanPAK4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26218748
PMCPMC4517872
OpenAlexW937241371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.