ArticlemAbs2015
Performance metrics for evaluating system suitability in liquid chromatography--Mass spectrometry peptide mass mapping of protein therapeutics and monoclonal antibodies.
Article in mAbs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Ratio Partial Proteolysis with Carrier Proteome (HOLSER) Enables Global Structure Profiling and Site-Resolved Elucidation of Ligand-Protein Interactions.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Establishing Quality Control Procedures for Large-Scale Plasma Proteomics Analyses.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- Comprehensive multi-attribute method workflow for biotherapeutic characterization and current good manufacturing practices testing.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Attribute Analytics Performance Metrics from the MAM Consortium Interlaboratory Study.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022Article
- Interlaboratory Study for Characterizing Monoclonal Antibodies by Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020Article
- Top-Down Characterization of an Intact Monoclonal Antibody Using Activated Ion Electron Transfer Dissociation.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of liquid chromatography--mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for the characterization of proteins can provide a plethora of information related to their structure, including amino acid sequence determination and analysis of posttranslational modifications. The variety of LC-MS based applications has led to the use of LC-MS characterization of therapeutic proteins and monoclonal antibodies as an integral part of the regulatory approval process. However, the improper use of an LC-MS system, related to intrinsic instrument limitations, improper tuning parameters, or poorly optimized methods may result in the production of low quality data. Improper system performance may arise from subtle changes in operating conditions that limit the ability to detect low abundance species. To address this issue, we systematically evaluated LC-MS/MS operating parameters to identify a set of metrics that can be used in a workflow to determine if a system is suitable for its intended purpose. Development of this workflow utilized a bovine serum albumin (BSA) digest standard spiked with synthetic peptides present at 0.1% to 100% of the BSA digest peptide concentration to simulate the detection of low abundance species using a traditional bottom-up workflow and data-dependent MS(2) acquisition. BSA sequence coverage, a commonly used indicator for instrument performance did not effectively identify settings that led to limited dynamic range or poorer absolute mass accuracy on 2 separate LC-MS systems. Additional metrics focusing on the detection limit and sensitivity for peptide identification were determined to be necessary to establish system suitability for protein therapeutic characterization by LC-MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.