Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218698›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2015

The impact of acute care surgery on appendicitis outcomes: Results from a national sample of university-affiliated hospitals.

John C Madore, Courtney E Collins, M Didem Ayturk, Heena P Santry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John C MadoreFrom the Department of Surgery (J.C.M., C.E.C., M.D.A., H.P.S.), and Surgery and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (D.A., H.P.S.), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Courtney E Collins
M Didem Ayturk
Heena P Santry
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Erie · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR031982 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SULLIVAN, JOHN LEWIS · 2010 to 2011
$6.8M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR000160 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2RR031981 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SULLIVAN, JOHN LEWIS · 2010 to 2011
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS 8KL2TR000160-03NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000160NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR031981-01NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR031981-02NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR031981NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031982NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR031982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency general surgery (EGS) in the United States. We examined the role of acute care surgery (ACS) on interventions and outcomes for acute appendicitis at a national sample of university-affiliated hospitals.

methodsWe surveyed senior surgeons responsible for EGS coverage at University HealthSystems Consortium hospitals, representing more than 90% of university-affiliated hospitals in the United States. The survey elicited data on resources allocated for EGS during 2013. Responses were linked to University HealthSystems Consortium outcomes data by unique hospital identifiers. Patients treated at hospitals reporting hybrid models for EGS coverage were excluded. Differences in interventions and outcomes between patients with acute appendicitis treated at ACS hospitals versus hospitals with a general surgeon on-call model (GSOC) were analyzed using univariate comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient demographics, clinical acuity, and hospital characteristics.

resultsWe found 122 hospitals meeting criteria for analysis where 2,565 patients were treated for acute appendicitis. Forty-eight percent of hospitals had an ACS model (n = 1,414), and 52% had a GSOC model (n = 1,151). Hospitals with ACS models were more likely to treat minority patients than those with GSOC models. Patients treated at ACS hospitals were more likely to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy. In multivariable modeling of patients who had surgery (n = 2,258), patients treated at ACS hospitals had 1.86 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.80) greater odds of undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

conclusionIn an era when laparoscopic appendectomy is increasingly accepted for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis, particularly in low-risk patients, it is concerning that patients treated at GSOC model hospitals are more likely to undergo traditional open surgery at the time of presentation. Furthermore, hospitals with ACS are functioning as safety-net hospitals for vulnerable patients with acute appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendicitisEmergenciesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitals, UniversityHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26218698
PMCPMC4519982
OpenAlexW1035961981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.